Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 3

  • Net addition to social housing stock

    • Reference: 2015/1668
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 17 June 2015
    What net addition to the social housing stock in London should you be making each year?
  • Nominee Passes

    • Reference: 2015/1950
    • Question by: Andrew Boff
    • Meeting date: 17 June 2015
    Research by my office has discovered that 8.4 million journeys were taken last year by those with nominee passes. This amounts to £22.2m every year in lost fare revenues. Do you think that this is flagrant waste of taxpayers' money in a time of such fiscal constraint?
  • Waltham Diving Facilities

    • Reference: 2015/0391
    • Question by: Andrew Boff
    • Meeting date: 21 January 2015
    The Waltham Forest Pool and Track redevelopment plan does not include a renewal of the 5m diving board facilities. Is this regrettable and what impact do you think this could have on the Olympic legacy?
  • Transport for London Business Plan (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 23 May 2012
    Darren Johnson (Deputy Chair): Assembly Member Biggs has a point of order. John Biggs (AM): The Chair told us there was a standing order about making assertions for which there was no evidence. Now, the Mayor has at the one time made an assertion for which he has evidence that he can cut council tax. Now he has made another assertion that on fares, he can make no such commitment. There is a fundamental inconsistency, it seems to me, under standing orders. Either one can be said and the other cannot, and either the both can be said or neither...
  • Affordable Homes for Rent

    • Reference: 2010/0105-1
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 20 October 2010
    What barriers prevent a greater proportion of affordable homes being delivered for rent, given the planned changes to housing benefit?
  • Strategic Leadership

    • Reference: 2010/0106-1
    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 20 October 2010
    Is there adequate strategic leadership of housing policy and its implementation in London?
  • Housing Devolution

    • Reference: 2010/0107-1
    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 20 October 2010
    What are the risks and opportunities of the proposal for a new Housing and Regeneration department within the GLA?
  • Families in Housing Need

    • Reference: 2010/0108-1
    • Question by: Steve O'Connell
    • Meeting date: 20 October 2010
    How have the prospects for families in housing need improved since the current Mayoralty began?
  • Strategic Leadership (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Andrew Boff
    • Meeting date: 20 October 2010
    Could you, Mr Blakeway, promise me not to carry anything over from the last administration with regard to housing? Could you promise three things really: first of all, could you promise not to disappoint Londoners with oversold targets that are unachievable? Could you promise me not to raise the aspirations of Londoners and then dash those hopes and blame someone else? Could you also promise not to build a home for somebody in housing need but actually deliver a rabbit hutch? So in short, can you assure me that the strategies will be realistic, achievable and honest, which would be...
  • Strategic Leadership (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Steve O'Connell
    • Meeting date: 20 October 2010
    Richard, a question for you. Would you not agree, following on from that debate you just had, that inflexible percentage targets are indeed a tired and lazy analysis of the needs of our residents?