Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 3

  • Flooding Action Plan

    • Reference: 2015/3751
    • Question by: Steve O'Connell
    • Meeting date: 18 November 2015
    What changes do you anticipate to the London Plan or other planning guidance as a result of your new action plan to help tackle flooding risks in London?
  • Starter Homes

    • Reference: 2015/3301
    • Question by: Steve O'Connell
    • Meeting date: 21 October 2015
    How will you be taking forward the Government's recent announcement to enable the delivery of Starter Homes in London?
  • Nominee Passes

    • Reference: 2015/1950
    • Question by: Andrew Boff
    • Meeting date: 17 June 2015
    Research by my office has discovered that 8.4 million journeys were taken last year by those with nominee passes. This amounts to £22.2m every year in lost fare revenues. Do you think that this is flagrant waste of taxpayers' money in a time of such fiscal constraint?
  • Sutton Transport Improvements

    • Reference: 2015/0402
    • Question by: Steve O'Connell
    • Meeting date: 21 January 2015
    In December you visited The Institute of Cancer Research in Belmont, where you made clear that you strongly supported the plans to expand to become the second biggest campus of its kind in the world. What effect will these plans have on the business case for the Sutton Tram Extension?
  • Waltham Diving Facilities

    • Reference: 2015/0391
    • Question by: Andrew Boff
    • Meeting date: 21 January 2015
    The Waltham Forest Pool and Track redevelopment plan does not include a renewal of the 5m diving board facilities. Is this regrettable and what impact do you think this could have on the Olympic legacy?
  • Recent changes at the LDA (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 17 March 2004
    Perhaps to address another part of your presentation, which links to this, you talked about the need for the LDA to have credibility with business, but are there not occasions when business has to have credibility with Londoners and the LDA needs to say that the employment, training and mentoring practices of the private sector in London are short-sighted, are disadvantaging London and, in the end, will disadvantage those businesses? I am being quite strident in pursuing that. Perhaps your Chair should answer that.
  • Recent changes at the LDA (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 17 March 2004
    Is that a priority for the LDA?
  • Recent changes at the LDA (Supplementary) [11]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 17 March 2004
    Which other priority is a lesser priority as a consequence of that? What I am trying to get my head around is the extent to which" Obviously in life you have to pursue a lot of relatively easy targets and priorities, but you need to take some challenging ones on now. I think, and I think a lot of my colleagues and constituents believe, that that is a really vital one for London and we have not done enough on it yet.
  • Skills (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 17 March 2004
  • LDA Agenda (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
    • Meeting date: 17 March 2004
    My question is on joined-up government and all these relationships with the ODPM, the DCMS, the DTI, GOL and all the rest of it. Did anybody inform you of the Government's new scheme to move some 80,000 jobs out of London? In a sense, there is a contradiction between the long-term plan that London is going to increase, and the Government actually trying to cut down the increase by moving jobs out of London. Was there any consultation with the LDA on this?