Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • The Impact of the 5th London Safety Plan

    • Reference: 2014/4105
    • Question by: Andrew Boff
    • Meeting date: 05 November 2014
    The final version of the 5th London Safety Plan (LSP5) was approved by LFEPA on 12 September 2013. Since its implementation, what impact has this integrated risk management plan had on the Authority’s delivery of its three key strategic aims of Prevention, Protection and Response?
  • Opening Statement

    • Reference: 2014/4960
    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 05 November 2014
    Can I invite you make a short opening statement before we move on to the questions which have been tabled?
  • Cost savings and the Sir Ken Knight Review

    • Reference: 2013/4407
    • Question by: Richard Tracey
    • Meeting date: 04 December 2013
    A recent review conducted by the Government's former Chief Fire and Rescue Advisor, Sir Ken Knight, identified nearly £200 million worth of potential savings across England and Wales' 46 Fire Authorities. Given the size and complexity of the London Fire Brigade, in comparison to the brigades on which the review focused, how many of the areas highlighted in the report offer a real opportunity for cost savings in the provision of fire and rescue cover to the Capital?
  • Borough Command Units (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 25 October 2012
    We accept the view, which has been expressed by the Mayor, which we directly elected members, we take the view that the most important thing for our boroughs is that there is a designated chief officer of whatever rank who is going to be responsible for the borough. That is key to us. If the Mayor says that he is going to do that, we certainly accept that. There is one additional thing that I want to raise with you in relation to this, is it not a fact that in many boroughs, certainly at night, in effect they operate...
  • Borough Command Units (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 25 October 2012
    Obviously you have quite a bit of flexible working between boroughs and within your own service. Are you looking at more flexible working with shared services involving the other emergency services?
  • Savings

    • Reference: 2012/0212-1
    • Question by: Andrew Boff
    • Meeting date: 12 September 2012
    The London Fire Brigade faces the same spending constraints as other public service organisations. More than £50 million of savings from support services have already been achieved but further savings must be considered in the development of the 2012 -2015 London Safety Plan 5. What are you doing to ensure that the Plan benefits from the views of firefighters and their representatives?
  • Personnel at Redbridge Fire Stations

    • Reference: 2012/0198-1
    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 12 September 2012
    Are any reductions in personnel at Redbridge Fire Stations on your draft list for cuts?
  • Cuts to LFB Budget (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Richard Tracey
    • Meeting date: 12 September 2012
    In the past two years it is correct, is it not, that you have been extremely helpful to the Police Service, because you have such fine reserves that you are able to give them financial contribution.
  • Savings Targets (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Richard Tracey
    • Meeting date: 12 September 2012
    So there is no particular reason that he will have changed his view. Can I ask you, can you give us some idea of how many meetings there have been over the last 12 months between finance officers of the GLA and finance officers at LFEPA? Do you happen to know how many there have been?
  • Savings (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Gareth Bacon MP
    • Meeting date: 12 September 2012
    I completely understand the passion and intensity that Mr Shah wants to bring to the question around budget savings and where that may fall. However, I must draw your attention to the fact that the very first question was asked around engagement within the group by Andrew Boff. Mr Shah has a question; it is the fourth question on the order paper where he can bring all of this in, and he seems to be reordering the meeting without any permission from anybody. I just wonder if that is in order, Madam Chairman?