Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • London Development Agency Funding of Organisations (Supplementary) [35]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    But none of the organisations which have recieved grants?
  • Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    Can you confirm then that the report that was issued is substantially, other than maybe a few housekeeping issues that might have emerged, the one that was presented to the Board on the Friday morning? I believe that is the case.
  • Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    Has he given you a timescale for what he is going to do or how he is going to do anything?
  • Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    I do not have any problem with the entirety. Just to clarify ' I think this has been clarified fairly well ' but the question of referrals to the police is because, when serious allegations are made ' and of course people making serious allegations have a serious responsibility to reflect on the seriousness of the allegations they are making ' the LDA is not a detective agency itself. You can confirm that it is not a detective agency?
  • Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    It would be premature, would it not?
  • Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    You have mentioned, Andrew, that this is your review. I want to be absolutely clear what the status of the District Auditor is in it now. Have you asked the District Auditor to do any further work or investigations?
  • Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [11]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    I might as well declare that I was the Chair of the Audit Committee of the LDA for a couple of years. I am very happy for that to be a matter of record as well; we did some very good work there. The District Audit is an independent service. There are of course two sides to this because politicians the world over use it as a foil for their political battles, but anyone in this Chamber, or indeed any member of the public, has a perfect right to contact the District Audit Service and to ask them to look...
  • Mobile Phones on the Underground

    • Reference: 2005/0117-1
    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    1)How much will it cost to implement your planned mobile phone use on a. Tube stations b. Tube trains? 2)Do you expect this scheme to be a cost burden on London Underground or a revenue raiser? How much do you expect it will cost - or will raise in revenue? 3)Do you propose charging mobile phone companies for access to mobile phone reception on the Tube or are you proposing another form of market mechanism or another form of mechanism altogether? If so, could you explain what it is. 4)Could there be health implications linked to reception provided for mobile...
  • PPP

    • Reference: 2005/0022-1
    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    What is your assessment of the current state of the PPP?
  • North London Line

    • Reference: 2005/0042-1
    • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    Can you outline your plans for improvements to the North London Line?