Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 1

Meeting type

Organisation

Question by 2

Status

  • Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [14]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    So, again, no intervention; the Board did not rewrite it, ask you to pull your punches or whatever?

  • Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [16]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    Therefore if you are looking at questions of the inner workings of organisations you might have funded in the past, you simply do not have the powers to investigate those to the extent that the allegations would suggest you might need to or might want to, or a third party might want to?

  • Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [21]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    Just for the record, what formally are those roles that you fulfil, then? You are an accountant, I believe, but also you are the Financial Officer and that is defined in statute. Is that right?

  • Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [23]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    Have you referred it then fully to the District Auditor and said, 'We think there is further work that needs to be done'?

  • Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [27]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    Not at this stage. Are you intending to then?

  • Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [28]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    Finally in terms of process, you mentioned that you have interviewed or taken evidence of the internal issues within the LDA and the people that currently work for the LDA. How many people are there that have left the LDA that were involved in these particular allegations that have therefore obviously not been interviewed or reviewed?

  • Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [29]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    Have you made any attempt whatsoever to contact any of them to contribute towards this review?

  • Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [32]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    I have a number of housekeeping questions: the first one, which I think follows very neatly from Peter Hulme Cross's intervention, is, can you confirm, Mr Travers, that you are a Statutory Officer and that you have trade and professional qualifications as well which require you to act with integrity and not to be nobbled by the Board or other officers of the LDA?

  • Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [35]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    Can we just be clear; you have not interviewed Lee Jasper or anyone else from the Mayor's Office, is that correct?

  • Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [41]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    What review did you take on his involvement, or anyone else from the Mayor's Office, in the grant giving and other processes?