Search questions

• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 14 June 2006

Will the aim be to try and link the targets established in the supplementary guidance?

• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 14 June 2006

In terms of renewable energy, the preferred standard in the Mayor's guidance that major developments should be zero carbon emissions, which goes considerably higher than was in the original bid proposal. Is there an opportunity, with the new planning permission coming forward, to actually increase the renewable component in some of the developments?

• Reference: 2006/0106-1
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 14 June 2006

Will all the Olympics developments meet the Preferred Standards in the Mayor's Supplementary Planning Guidance on Sustainable Design and Construction?

• Reference: 2003/0312
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 15 October 2003

What do you think is appropriate local consultation on the siting and future use of Olympic Games facilities? .

• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 15 October 2003

Given that the masterplan, which will set the locations for the facilities within the area, must be ready by December of this year, how can we possibly have meaningful consultation when the timetable is so tight?

• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 15 October 2003

Just quickly on the financing aspect. There are so many problems facing London and we have covered some of them today. How can you go about convincing Londoners that this is the best possible use of a Council Tax increase, given that there are so many other priorities facing London? We have only had city-wide Government in London for three years and we are facing so many problem in terms of transport, regeneration, environmental issues and so on. How can you convince people that extra money for the Olympics is the best possible use of Council Tax payers' money?