Search questions

• Reference: 2003/0304
• Question by: Graham Tope
• Meeting date: 15 October 2003

How will local communities across the capital be involved in developing the bid and delivering the Games? .

• Question by: Graham Tope
• Meeting date: 15 October 2003

Thank you, Chair. The answer was very encouraging and dealt with a lot of our interests. Chair, you mentioned that we were in Brent last night for People's Question Time. The audience of several hundred people were asked what they thought was London's strongest asset. The answer, by what I think was a very substantial margin, was its people, by which I think we mean the cultural diversity and so on. If that is London's greatest strength - and I think many of us think it is - how will you be able to link that into the bid and...

• Question by: Graham Tope
• Meeting date: 15 October 2003

Thank you very much. Can I now turn to training facilities, which we talked about earlier. I think you mentioned in your introduction that 10 boroughs will actually have sporting events taking place in them. I must say I had not realised there would be that many. What about the other 22 boroughs? Obviously, they cannot have sporting events taking place there, but what about using their facilities for teams to train at?

• Reference: 2001/0185-1
• Question by: Graham Tope
• Meeting date: 10 October 2001

What progress has the LDA made on developing a tourism strategy for London? .

• Reference: 2001/0187-1
• Question by: Graham Tope
• Meeting date: 10 October 2001

How is the LDA working to influence EU economic development policy? .

• Reference: 2001/0188-1
• Question by: Graham Tope
• Meeting date: 10 October 2001

Is it the LDA's policy to respond to European Commission calls for proposals, such as the recent call for proposals regarding the formulation of a framework for co-operation to promote urban development? .

• Reference: 2001/0194-1
• Question by: Graham Tope
• Meeting date: 10 October 2001

It has taken the LDA over a year to produce the Economic Development Strategy, and yet the strategy produced resembles nothing more than a pre-strategy, setting out measures necessary before a real, meaningful strategy can be produced. Can this really be considered an adequate response to London's economic development needs? .