Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

  • Challenges and Risks (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Kit Malthouse
    • Meeting date: 10 March 2010
    I wanted to explore your not-for-profit status. My assumption, from what you are saying, is that, with the not-for-profit status of the Legacy Company, it is not, therefore, envisaged there will be any return to the shareholders at any point, and that any surplus that may or may not arise would be ploughed back into the Park effectively. You are saying it may be the case that actually it is the reverse; it is not only a not-for-profit company but it might be a, 'We need more money company' and that you might look to the shareholders for more money...
  • Future of Olympic Stadium (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Kit Malthouse
    • Meeting date: 10 March 2010
    It sounds to me like you are saying, in coded language, that the retention of the athletics obligation is a disincentive, effectively, for commercial companies to come forward and use the stadium. Is that right?
  • Land remediation (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Kit Malthouse
    • Meeting date: 10 March 2010
    On remediation, are you aware of any warranty protection that the ODA might have on remediation with the contractors and, if so, will you inherit it? If not, is there a general remediation insurance policy in place for any works that may or may not be needed, and are you going to inherit and therefore keep that one on?
  • Circle Line (1)

    • Reference: 2009/0307-1
    • Question by: Kit Malthouse
    • Meeting date: 09 December 2009
    What will be the effect on a) quantity b) frequency and c) reliability of trains serving the Bayswater station when the new 'extended' Circle line comes into operation next month?
  • Circle Line (2)

    • Reference: 2009/0308-1
    • Question by: Kit Malthouse
    • Meeting date: 09 December 2009
    Does the Mayor expect the new Circle line service pattern to be a permanent change or will it be reviewed and assessed in due course?
  • TfL Structure (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Kit Malthouse
    • Meeting date: 14 June 2009
    Peter, could I just draw you back into the quagmire of Metronet for a moment. I wondered two things. First of all, obviously anybody who looked at the structure of Metronet - and I am glad you agree - could see that it was crackers right from the start and was going to end in disaster. Given that the magic circle of contractors who owned Metronet were effectively awarding contracts to themselves and therefore that structure was going to collapse at some cost, are those same contractors still performing work on the lines on Metronet? If so, are they doing...
  • Estuary Airport (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Kit Malthouse
    • Meeting date: 14 June 2009
    Mr Mayor, would you agree with me that had the British Airways flight that crash landed just within the perimeter of Heathrow a year ago landed 800 yards short of where it eventually landed we would not be having this conversation about "if", we would be having a conversation about "when" we move Heathrow Airport? If the third runway is announced and Heathrow continues in its position when an airliner ploughs into the suburbs of west London would you please take the opponents of the estuary airport and the Members of the Labour Group with you when you go to...