Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • LLDC Finances

    • Reference: 2017/4144
    • Question by: Lord Bailey of Paddington
    • Meeting date: 02 November 2017
    When will the LLDC be on a more financially stable footing?
  • LLDC and the current housing climate (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Andrew Boff
    • Meeting date: 02 November 2017
    Andrew Boff AM: The Local Plan says the LLDC will exceed the London Plan’s target of 1,471 housing units per annum. Does that remain your aspiration?
  • LLDC Finances (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Gareth Bacon MP
    • Meeting date: 02 November 2017
    Gareth Bacon AM: Thank you, Chair. I will start by echoing something you said earlier on, David, and it was echoed by Sir Peter. As a regeneration project, it has to be acknowledged that it is successful. Compared to any other Olympic city in the past, what has happened in London is transformationally better than anywhere else. That said, of course, there are some caveats to that and the biggest running sore is the Stadium. I am going to go back over a couple of the points that have been covered by other Members, just to try to get more...
  • LLDC Finances (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Andrew Boff
    • Meeting date: 02 November 2017
    Andrew Boff AM: How could something be described as ‘sustainable’ when London taxpayers will have to keep propping you up every year and you cannot tell us when that is going to stop? How is that sustainable?
  • Transport

    • Reference: 2003/0308
    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    What transport demand modelling is currently being undertaken to establish the volume of passenger demand and the predicted transport patterns? If this modelling is being undertaken, who is carrying this work out? If it is not happening, why not? .
  • Transport (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    But that is not part of the Olympic bid; it is there anyway.
  • Transport (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    This is all a happy accident, is it not? All of these things were going to be in place anyway regardless of whether we get the bid or not. Can you point to any material transport improvement that Londoners will benefit from specifically because we have the Olympic Games in East London, which we were not going to have before?
  • Transport (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    What are the conclusions that you draw from that model?
  • Transport (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    It sounds like you are relying on what you call operational enhancements and the Mayor's figures about the numbers going down for other reasons over the summer. Does this mean that once the Games are over there will be very little in the way of material transport improvements for Londoners to enjoy afterwards?
  • Transport (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003