Search questions

• Question by: Roger Evans
• Meeting date: 17 March 2004

• Question by: Roger Evans
• Meeting date: 17 March 2004

That was originally where I was going, but we seem to have unearthed a whole new interesting line of enquiry. Perhaps you could come back with a written response to say what is being done rather than us put you on the spot here.

• Reference: 2003/0308
• Question by: Roger Evans
• Meeting date: 15 October 2003

What transport demand modelling is currently being undertaken to establish the volume of passenger demand and the predicted transport patterns? If this modelling is being undertaken, who is carrying this work out? If it is not happening, why not? .

• Question by: Roger Evans
• Meeting date: 15 October 2003

But that is not part of the Olympic bid; it is there anyway.

• Question by: Roger Evans
• Meeting date: 15 October 2003

This is all a happy accident, is it not? All of these things were going to be in place anyway regardless of whether we get the bid or not. Can you point to any material transport improvement that Londoners will benefit from specifically because we have the Olympic Games in East London, which we were not going to have before?

• Question by: Roger Evans
• Meeting date: 15 October 2003

What are the conclusions that you draw from that model?

• Question by: Roger Evans
• Meeting date: 15 October 2003

It sounds like you are relying on what you call operational enhancements and the Mayor's figures about the numbers going down for other reasons over the summer. Does this mean that once the Games are over there will be very little in the way of material transport improvements for Londoners to enjoy afterwards?

• Question by: Roger Evans
• Meeting date: 15 October 2003

• Question by: Roger Evans
• Meeting date: 15 October 2003

• Question by: Roger Evans
• Meeting date: 15 October 2003