Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [25]

    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    So you are telling the Assembly that, simply based on the information that you held in your records, on the assumption that all of your records were complete, you were able to come to a conclusion with regard to what Brenda Stern said, that as far as you were concerned there is no case to answer? Would not the obvious thing for you to have done have been to go to the source of the allegations? Is that not an elementary thing to do? Why did you limit your investigation just to the material which you say that you hold?
  • Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [37]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    So are those the records that the LDA has of email traffic and other aspects?
  • London Development Agency Funding of Organisations (Supplementary) [10]

    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    So you are telling the Assembly that, simply based on the information that you held in your records, on the assumption that all of your records were complete, you were able to come to a conclusion with regard to what Brenda Stern said, that as far as you were concerned there is no case to answer? Would not the obvious thing for you to have done have been to go to the source of the allegations? Is that not an elementary thing to do? Why did you limit your investigation just to the material which you say that you hold?
  • Transport

    • Reference: 2003/0308
    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    What transport demand modelling is currently being undertaken to establish the volume of passenger demand and the predicted transport patterns? If this modelling is being undertaken, who is carrying this work out? If it is not happening, why not? .
  • Transport (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    But that is not part of the Olympic bid; it is there anyway.
  • Transport (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    This is all a happy accident, is it not? All of these things were going to be in place anyway regardless of whether we get the bid or not. Can you point to any material transport improvement that Londoners will benefit from specifically because we have the Olympic Games in East London, which we were not going to have before?
  • Transport (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    What are the conclusions that you draw from that model?
  • Transport (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    It sounds like you are relying on what you call operational enhancements and the Mayor's figures about the numbers going down for other reasons over the summer. Does this mean that once the Games are over there will be very little in the way of material transport improvements for Londoners to enjoy afterwards?
  • Transport (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
  • Transport (Supplementary) [9]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003