Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Transport (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    This is all a happy accident, is it not? All of these things were going to be in place anyway regardless of whether we get the bid or not. Can you point to any material transport improvement that Londoners will benefit from specifically because we have the Olympic Games in East London, which we were not going to have before?
  • Transport (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    What are the conclusions that you draw from that model?
  • Transport (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    It sounds like you are relying on what you call operational enhancements and the Mayor's figures about the numbers going down for other reasons over the summer. Does this mean that once the Games are over there will be very little in the way of material transport improvements for Londoners to enjoy afterwards?
  • Transport (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
  • Transport (Supplementary) [9]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
  • Transport (Supplementary) [12]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
  • Transport (Supplementary) [13]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    Is that a no, or a maybe?
  • LDA Board Meetings (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 10 October 2001
  • LDA Board Meetings (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Lynne Featherstone
    • Meeting date: 10 October 2001
    Thank you. I think you have just demonstrated the point, actually. You've given a reasonably full answer on tourism, which is something we should have had before. If it wasn't Functional Bodies Question Time today, would we have had that information? The point about this whole debate, and I think you're getting it cross-party actually, is the feeling that you stick out like a sore thumb in your attitude towards openness and accountability, not just to the public. I would like these meetings all to be public and I would like all the information. What you've said today should have...
  • LDA Board Meetings (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Meg Hillier
    • Meeting date: 10 October 2001
    I share a number of the concerns that Tony's outlined and if we can perhaps particularly focus on the website. We're supposed to be, as the GLA family, into open government and the web approach was something that was an ethos that the Mayor and others agree is a great way of people having access. However, if you go onto the LDA website it seems, as Tony says, that you control what comes out in terms of press releases and I haven't yet managed to find the minutes on the website. Maybe I'm just not very good at browsing. But...