Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Stephen Knight
    • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
    Stephen Knight AM: Just one quick point and that is, is it legally possible to spend Section 106 or CIL money outside the boundary of a planning authority?
  • Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Murad Qureshi
    • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
    Murad Qureshi AM: Can I raise two or three issues. The first one, Eddie, I am grateful that you mentioned the canals at the outset. It is just unfortunate they do not show up on the maps. I have no doubts that residential developers will be eying those canal sides very eagerly, because I suspect they can enhance the values of the developments by up to 40%. That is the residential side. However, I am more concerned that they are used during the works construction on the site. I think this is going to be a huge development site, over...
  • Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [9]

    • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
    • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
    Jenette Arnold OBE (Deputy Chair): I have a couple of questions, one for Sir Eddie, and one for Victoria Hills. Sir Eddie, in your introduction you mentioned that the Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation (OPDC) master plan was similar to the blueprint adopted by the LLDC. I know, as one of the three Assembly Members for the area covered by the LLDC, and was heavily involved in the consultation and now I keep a very strong watching brief on what is going on, that many aspects of the LLDC’s vision has changed. For instance, the LLDC plan started...
  • Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [11]

    • Question by: Richard Tracey
    • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
    Richard Tracey AM: Thank you, Mr Chairman. Edward, can I first of all thank you for organising for the letter to Kit Malthouse [AM] about Wormwood Scrubs, which of course has been circulated to all of us. All of us on this side have received emails from many people who certainly were not constituents of ours but had some concerns, so I think it has helped very much to clarify, and I am grateful to Kit for writing to the Mayor about it. First of all though, I was going to say there is a lot of experience in this...
  • West London Tram

    • Reference: 2003/0220
    • Question by: Richard Barnes
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    Will he make publicly available the questions asked by ORC International for the TfL opinion poll on the West London Tram released on the 20 March 2003? .
  • West London Tram

    • Reference: 2003/0221
    • Question by: Richard Barnes
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    What is the current estimate for the total cost of the West London Tram? .
  • West London Tram

    • Reference: 2003/0222
    • Question by: Richard Barnes
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    What negotiations have occurred between TfL and private sector companies over PFI financing for the West London Tram? .
  • West London Tram

    • Reference: 2003/0223
    • Question by: Richard Barnes
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    Why has the decision on proceeding with the West London Tram been delayed until January 2004? .
  • Congestion Charge around Heathrow Airport

    • Reference: 2003/0224
    • Question by: Richard Barnes
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    What negotiations have occurred between TfL and British Airports Authority over the introduction of a congestion charge around Heathrow Airport? .
  • Bus Lanes

    • Reference: 2003/0225
    • Question by: Richard Barnes
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    What volume of objections from local residents would be required for TfL to conduct wider consultation on the impact on bus lanes? Who decides if such objections are valid or not? .