Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Mobile Phones on the Underground

    • Reference: 2005/0117-1
    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    1)How much will it cost to implement your planned mobile phone use on a. Tube stations b. Tube trains? 2)Do you expect this scheme to be a cost burden on London Underground or a revenue raiser? How much do you expect it will cost - or will raise in revenue? 3)Do you propose charging mobile phone companies for access to mobile phone reception on the Tube or are you proposing another form of market mechanism or another form of mechanism altogether? If so, could you explain what it is. 4)Could there be health implications linked to reception provided for mobile...
  • PPP

    • Reference: 2005/0022-1
    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    What is your assessment of the current state of the PPP?
  • North London Line

    • Reference: 2005/0042-1
    • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    Can you outline your plans for improvements to the North London Line?
  • Vandalism on Buses

    • Reference: 2005/0062-1
    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    Further to my previous question asked in 2003 (1032/2003), please can you advise what progress has been made to tackle the epidemic of vandalism on buses in South East London, and whether offences have decreased as a result.
  • Step Change and Public Expectations

    • Reference: 2003/0427
    • Question by: Richard Barnes
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    Given the overwhelming public demand for more community based police patrolling on foot, will the step-change programme prove sufficient to meet public expectations? .
  • Cost of Capital City and Security Functions

    • Reference: 2003/0434
    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    Has research been undertaken within the MPS to examine if the funding from the Home Office for capital city and security functions fully meets the true cost of providing these services, and if so, what were its conclusions? .
  • Domestic Violence (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    That is very welcome. I think Sir John quite rightly said how important it is that victims continue to receive support. What are we doing to ensure that victims are kept informed of the progress of their case? Hopefully there is a lot of support usually at the beginning and shortly after the incident. It takes quite a long time to go through to judicial disposal. What attention is paid to keeping these victims informed?
  • Racism and Sexism (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    Given that those responsible for racist and sexist behaviour in the force have often been responsible for homophobic behaviour as well, can you outline how homophobia is tackled as part of the programme of initiatives that Toby outlined?
  • Private Infracos

    • Reference: 2003/0251
    • Question by: Noel Lynch
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    What residual powers will be retained by LUL / TfL when the Underground stations are transferred by lease to the private infracos? In particular, will the private infracos be completely free (subject to planning controls) to develop station space above or around station sites commercially for maximum profit? .
  • Tube and PPP contracts

    • Reference: 2003/0145
    • Question by: Lynne Featherstone
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    The closure of the extremely busy Central Line for the best part of three months, though highly inconvenient, showed that London does not have to come to a halt if a key line is closed down. Do you now believe that TfL could get very much better value for money out of the PPP contracts if work to upgrade the Tube system (track, signalling, stations) were concentrated into periods where lines or sections of line were closed entirely, rather than being restricted to 12.30am 5.30am with all the inefficiencies of stop-start-stop that this entails? .