Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Chip & Pin System

    • Reference: 2005/0090-1
    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    What plans does Tfl have for the roll out of Chip and Pin systems at all its payment facilities?
  • Local Residents

    • Reference: 2003/0194
    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    What consultation processes with local affected residents does Tfl implement when it is sitting new bus stops or new bus routes? .
  • Local Residents (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    I never thought I was going to be completely gob smacked by an answer from you relating to a simple matter of bus stops, but that simple matter has produced the very big statement that you would not like to see consultation get in the way of progress. It is an absolutely extraordinary thing to say considering the service oriented provision that you make.
  • Local Residents (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    So the residents of suburban London who effectively have new routes foisted on them " I draw your attention to the routes 419 and 485 in Barnes, where I have been in constant communication with TfL since before your appointment. The residents in quiet suburban streets are having very large double?decker buses and very long single?decker buses going up and down their quiet streets without anybody being consulted on it. I am told there is not a wing mirror which is safe in some of these streets, because of these buses. The argument which is provided by your TfL spokesman...
  • Local Residents (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    So you are not going to do anything about it.
  • Mayor's Draft Waste Strategy (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 14 November 2001
    I wonder if you could tell us how you're proposing to ensure that the boroughs, when they collect recyclable materials, actually have a market for them and they're not left with a large surplus which they have to dispose of themselves?
  • Mayor's Draft Waste Strategy (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 14 November 2001
    Except there's nothing more disillusioning for the residents of London who assiduously separate recyclable materials then to discover that those materials are in effect going straight to landfill. For example in the London Borough of Sutton, which turns out in fact to be the pariah of recycling authorities rather than allegedly the angel of recycling authorities, glass which is collected in the London Borough of Sutton goes directly to landfill. It does not pass go and it most definitely doesn't collect £200, and this in the London Borough of Sutton and I suspect over the whole of London is creating...
  • Mayor's Draft Waste Strategy (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 14 November 2001
    What about the general point that I've just made to you about those residents who are very keen to collect recyclable materials, but if they discover that these recyclable materials are not actually being recycled at all how would you suggest that borough councils explain that to their residents?
  • Mayor's Draft Waste Strategy (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 14 November 2001
    So are you suggesting that if there is to be no market for recyclable goods because of perhaps a glut or something, then boroughs should in fact say to their residents, 'Well it's an enormously costly exercise to sort and collect and so on. Just tip it in the ordinary refuse as you would have done before the days of recycling.'