Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Silverlink Metro Services (Supplementary) [10]

    • Question by: Damian Hockney
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    On your own admission just now, you have made clear that the transport system is not ideal. We have a situation here where people are being asked to pay not only a 60% increase, but with the western extension, TfL's own economic impact assessment makes clear that there will be a reduction in lunch-time customers for restaurants, shift-workers such as cleaners will suffer, `retailers may close down', `retailers may relocate', and delivery costs will be passed to customers. Are you not at all concerned about the disastrous impact of the Congestion Charge and the western extension over the next few...
  • Silverlink Metro Services (Supplementary) [11]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    Does Professor Glaister's comment accurately reflect the view of the TfL board as far as Congestion Charging is concerned in its purpose?
  • Silverlink Metro Services (Supplementary) [12]

    • Question by: Angie Bray
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    What about the public inquiry the ALG has called for, a cross-party call to you?
  • Silverlink Metro Services (Supplementary) [13]

    • Question by: Angie Bray
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    Can I ask about one other aspect? Recently, there was a call from the Association of London Government (ALG), a cross-party call, for a pause in this whole rolling out of the Congestion Charge westwards, and to allow for a public inquiry to take place, not least because we understand, and you yourself went on record to say that some very interesting trial work was being done on tag and beacon. Would it not be better to pause before you put all these cameras in and have a public inquiry to look at where we are on this whole issue?
  • Commuter rail services - Waterloo (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    Have you actually talked to the Government about the funding being available?
  • Commuter rail services - Waterloo (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    I have a concern, and I wonder if you share it, that obviously it is a very expensive site and so if that money is not forthcoming, what would happen if there was a suggestion that it could be sold off for commercial developers for non-transport usage? Do you think that is a possibility and if it were, what would your position be on it?
  • TfL (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    Therefore, you are not holding out any hope that I am going to see a sustainable transport unit this year.
  • TfL (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    I am not entirely happy about it being a policy unit because I think it is very important that it reaches right through the organisation but also that it is quite practically based. I am concerned about the status it has because, for me, this should have a very, very high-status, just because it has the possibility of transforming the way TfL does everything
  • TfL (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    I was talking about the work on the Routemasters rather than the hydrogen buses, which cost over £0.5 million each.
  • TfL (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    Do you regret the decision to spend millions of pounds cleaning up the pollution from Routemaster buses now that you decided to scrap them just a couple of years later?