Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

  • Housing Demand (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 24 October 2007
    So why have you set such a low limit? Why not 25% or 30%?
  • Housing Demand (Supplementary) [11]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 24 October 2007
    Finally, what are you going to do about the still considerable number of empty properties that are not brought onto the housing market at all?
  • Housing Demand (Supplementary) [17]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 24 October 2007
    The key is that when those properties come available, there is a queue a mile long to acquire them. So, there is clearly a need for more of those types of properties.
  • Housing Demand (Supplementary) [25]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 24 October 2007
    Two quick areas I would just like to raise: how are you going to address the need for new affordable housing for families when we have already got a surplus of one bedroom properties at affordable level, and a large element of the developments that have taken place have been two bedroom properties? In actual fact the demand now in London is very much for family housing, both for affordable housing for rent but also housing that can be bought by families.
  • Housing Demand (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 24 October 2007
    Why then has the Mayor opposed, for example, what Wandsworth has been doing to bring back empty homes into the housing market?
  • Sporting Legacy

    • Reference: 2007/0016-1
    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 15 February 2007
    There is no evidence from previous Games that the event led to any sustained increase in sports participation. Why should London's Games be different?
  • Terms of the termination of your engagement to which TfL have agreed. (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 18 January 2006
    Would anything in that contract prevent you, for example, from revealing details of discussions between yourself and the Mayor on the reasons for you leaving?
  • Terms of the termination of your engagement to which TfL have agreed. (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 18 January 2006
    Do you accept that the overall package is unprecedented in the public sector in this country, in the settlement of your leaving?
  • Terms of the termination of your engagement to which TfL have agreed. (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 18 January 2006
    I think the difference may be expressed from our perspective that if it is a private company that is being examined, and the Chief Executive leaves, that is something that is private. However, this is public money. That is why the concern is being expressed as to the full extent of the package that you have enjoyed. From our perspective, one of the things that we would seek to know is this £745,000 bonus payment, which we understand is being paid, is there in addition to that a lump-sum payment to be paid by the 31 March?
  • Terms of the termination of your engagement to which TfL have agreed. (Supplementary) [8]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 18 January 2006
    The other issue is, as part of the contractual negotiation, which would not be unusual, is there a gagging clause that prevents you discussing the full details of the reasons for you leaving or the other effects of the contract?