Search questions

• Question by: Brian Coleman
• Meeting date: 15 November 2006

We understand that, Sir Roy, but Mr Neill has asked a specific question. I would be grateful if you could address it.

• Question by: Brian Coleman
• Meeting date: 15 November 2006

I do not think Mrs Howlett is suggesting that it did come from you. She is just asking if there is any truth in it?

• Reference: 2006/0389-1
• Question by: Brian Coleman
• Meeting date: 15 November 2006

In his remarks to the Idaho Statesman, Jack Lemley said that political disputes will make the Olympics come in late and over budget. Is he telling the truth, or is he deliberately trying to mislead?

• Reference: 2006/0391-1
• Question by: Brian Coleman
• Meeting date: 15 November 2006

Mr Lemley was also concerned about soaring costs. Given that you are going to the Treasury to ask for extra money for the regeneration that was promised, why was the Olympic Delivery Authority not upfront about the real cost of the promised legacy from the outset?

• Reference: 2006/0392-1
• Question by: Brian Coleman
• Meeting date: 15 November 2006

Mr Lemley also predicted that, despite your assurances, Games venues will not be delivered on schedule. Please can you confirm the date on which construction work on the stadium, the aquatic centre and the Olympic village will be completed?

• Question by: Brian Coleman
• Meeting date: 18 January 2006

Mr Kiley, in answer to my colleague, Bob Blackman, you mentioned that you would not disclose details that affected other personnel. Are there any other members of TfL staff ' either in the Commissioner's office or elsewhere ' who are leaving as a result of your departure? Have you negotiated any pay-offs for them?

• Reference: 2005/0099-1
• Question by: Brian Coleman
• Meeting date: 06 April 2005

Following the Spending Review 2004 announcement, were your views sought or given on which schemes should proceed within the available funding? Did you express a view that lower risk schemes such as the major A406 schemes in Barnet, which have cleared all planning and legal requirements, should be given priority over higher risk schemes which are still subject to consultation and public inquiry? If not, do you consider this would have been prudent advice?

• Reference: 2005/0100-1
• Question by: Brian Coleman
• Meeting date: 06 April 2005

Although a capacity increase of 20% resulting from the revised TfL scheme for Bounds Green was discussed at the meeting between the Mayor and borough representatives on 3 February 2005, TfL now appear to have no knowledge of this. Would you agree that it is vital for local residents to be told exactly what increase in capacity the TfL scheme will deliver, not least to help them understand whether the scheme offers value for money? Do you know what percentage increase in capacity will be delivered by the scheme and are you willing to quote this figure publicly?

• Reference: 2005/0101-1
• Question by: Brian Coleman
• Meeting date: 06 April 2005

In responding to the London Borough of Barnet's objections to the designation of the A598 as a Strategic Road, the Government Office for London has stated: 'The A598 is an important route in the SRN. It provides an important link between the A41 and Golders Green and North Finchley as an alternative to using the congested A41 and A406.' Do you regard the suggestion that traffic should use this borough road as an alternative to the TLRN as criticism of TfL's management of the A41 and A406? Can you explain what measures TfL will implement to reduce congestion on the...

• Reference: 2005/0102-1
• Question by: Brian Coleman
• Meeting date: 06 April 2005

Will the Commissioner accept my thanks on behalf of many of my constituents for Transport for London's refusal to allow advertisements for holiday destinations to the illegal and unrecognised Turkish Republic of North Cyprus on London Buses and the Tube?