Search questions

• Question by: Bob Neill
• Meeting date: 10 October 2006

Yes, indeed. Now obviously we want to try it. As you say, the key word is `if', so I am just interested for the future as to what we can do to try and make sure, as far as possible, there are not losses of those kind.

• Question by: Bob Neill
• Meeting date: 10 October 2006

I think that has been very positive and I am grateful for those answers. I was surprised to see something in the sports section of the Daily Telegraph the other week which seemed to suggest that the Mayor had undertaken to underwrite losses of some £10 million a year on the Olympic Park after 2012. I was surprised to see that and I wondered if you could shed any light on where that comes from and where we are about the future financing of those issues? All of us obviously want to see the maximum use and the maximum public...

• Question by: Bob Neill
• Meeting date: 10 October 2006

Can you just help me; Is there any timeframe put on that or not?

• Question by: Bob Neill
• Meeting date: 10 October 2006

As far as you are aware?

• Question by: Bob Neill
• Meeting date: 10 October 2006

I am not trying to put you on the spot. You are the best witness we have got available.

• Question by: Bob Neill
• Meeting date: 10 October 2006

Is there any further discussion about the possibility of a major professional sporting club or anything of that kind?

• Question by: Bob Neill
• Meeting date: 18 January 2006

The reason that I am interested in that is, is there going to be anything in addition to the fee, which was upfront and we have seen that, up to 90 days, how that is calculated? You are keeping the occupancy of the premises in Belgravia; that is part of the negotiated deal, I take it. Will there be other matters? For example, the council tax on that property, insurance, pension contributions ' will that cover the lot?

• Question by: Bob Neill
• Meeting date: 18 January 2006

What is the essential difference between what service you are going to be providing as a consultant, and what the role of Peter Hendy is as the Transport Commissioner, and what the role of Redmond O'Neill is as the (GLA's) Executive Director of Public Affairs and Transport? Where is the line between them? Is there a line or is there not?

• Question by: Bob Neill
• Meeting date: 18 January 2006

I understand what you have said, and I need not recap it. This is a challenging job but a lot has been done, but there is still more to do. There is much that you could be judged proud of and you are clearly anxious to be still in the policy and the strategic decisions, so to move to a consultant role was a slightly unnatural one for you. I assume that was your state of mind when you signed the new contract: that you were still up for it and ready to go.

• Question by: Bob Neill
• Meeting date: 06 April 2005

Does Professor Glaister's comment accurately reflect the view of the TfL board as far as Congestion Charging is concerned in its purpose?