Search questions

• Question by: Dee Doocey
• Meeting date: 18 January 2006

Do you understand our concern, Mr Kiley, that you are living in a house rent-free that according to the Mayor's figures could be rented on the open market for £2,000 a week? Up to the end of your tenure, that would actually bring in or save the taxpayer £250,000 specifically at a time when there are 60,000 families in temporary accommodation, and doctors, nurses, care workers, etc., cannot afford to live anywhere near their place of work. Is this not taking accommodation for key workers to ridiculous heights?

• Question by: Dee Doocey
• Meeting date: 06 April 2005

Have you actually talked to the Government about the funding being available?

• Question by: Dee Doocey
• Meeting date: 06 April 2005

I have a concern, and I wonder if you share it, that obviously it is a very expensive site and so if that money is not forthcoming, what would happen if there was a suggestion that it could be sold off for commercial developers for non-transport usage? Do you think that is a possibility and if it were, what would your position be on it?

• Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
• Meeting date: 06 April 2005

We were told first of all by the Mayor that this would prevent congestion, it would also improve air quality, but you do not care about that now and neither does the Mayor - it is only an income raiser.

• Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
• Meeting date: 06 April 2005

Mr Kiley, recently a constituent of mine had her car removed from her driveway in the middle of the night by bailiffs for non-payment of the Congestion Charge. Only through her own quick thinking, was she able to obtain a court injunction to stop the car being sold within two days. She then had to pay excessive fees, to both bailiff company and auctioneer, to recover her car. That her car was taken came as a surprise as, although TfL's bailiffs were able to locate her address to take the car, they were unable to send a penalty charge notice...

• Reference: 2005/0111-1
• Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
• Meeting date: 06 April 2005

Mr Kiley, TfL charges £50 as a standard Penalty Charge Notice, which rises to £100 after 14 days. For appellants who dispute the PCN, there exists the risk that an unsuccessful appeal will incur a fine of £100 should the appeals process be delayed. Is this system of fines being used to disincentivise appeals, and does this represent the use of penalties by TfL as a primarily revenue raising device as opposed to an incentive to obey the law? Also, is it not unfair that customers who pay the Congestion Charge, but state their intention to appeal, are not recognised...

• Reference: 2005/0112-1
• Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
• Meeting date: 06 April 2005

Mr Kiley, recently a constituent of mine paid his Congestion Charge via text message for the first time. He mistakenly entered the letters REG, denoting "registration", before entering his registration number. TfL therefore accepted payment for a car with a ten character number plate. When appealing the subsequent PCN, the adjudicator acknowledged that payment had been received for registration REG XXXX XXX but felt unable, despite my constituent's explanation, to recognise the honest mistake. What guidance exists to stop such an illogical approach being taken again, and is there some method of rectifying such spelling mistakes after payment of the...

• Reference: 2005/0113-1
• Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
• Meeting date: 06 April 2005

Can the Commissioner explain how correspondence from an Assembly Member sent to the Congestion Charge Enforcement Office in Coventry was (a) not recorded (b) not responded to? What facility exists for processing correspondence in TfL's Coventry Congestion Charging Enforcement office that does not have a customer reference number? What assurances can the Commissioner give that correspondence to TfL from Assembly Members will be answered promptly?

• Reference: 2005/0114-1
• Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
• Meeting date: 06 April 2005

Can the Commissioner advise the Assembly what information is given to customer's who have their car impounded regarding their legal rights, specifically with regard to ensuring confiscated vehicles are not sold prior to independent adjudication?

• Reference: 2005/0115-1
• Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
• Meeting date: 06 April 2005

Mr Kiley, recently a constituent of mine had her car removed from her driveway in the middle of the night by bailiffs for non-payment of the Congestion Charge. Only through her own quick thinking, was she able to obtain a court injunction to stop the car being sold within two days. She then had to pay excessive fees, to both bailiff company and auctioneer, to recover her car. That her car was taken came as a surprise as, though TfL's bailiffs were able to locate her address to take the car, they were unable to send a Penalty Charge Notice...