Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 3

  • London 2036: an agenda for jobs and growth

    • Reference: 2015/1995
    • Question by: Stephen Knight
    • Meeting date: 01 July 2015
    What is the status of the 'London 2036: an agenda for jobs and growth' plan in relation to the ‘Jobs and Growth Plan for London’?
  • Stronger, fairer, and more innovative London economy (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
    • Meeting date: 01 July 2015
    Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM: I have a specific question for Mr McGrath. Very briefly, Harvey, employment is a key for a stronger economy and you talked very much about this document and yet it does not mention anywhere the challenge of parental employment. Given that around 10% fewer women who are parents in London are in employment compared to the rest of the UK, have you done any work on this issue and perhaps the childcare challenges that the capital faces?
  • Stronger, fairer, and more innovative London economy (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Stephen Knight
    • Meeting date: 01 July 2015
    Stephen Knight AM: Thank you, Chair. My question was on this issue of London’s relationship with the EU, which your report makes quite a few comments about in terms of London ‘staying open for business’. It is quite clear in terms of the need to maintain the relationship with the EU and the dangers of undermining that relationship. In particular, I wanted to ask you about - and I am reading from the report - wanting to: “... strengthen London’s voice on national policies that could put London’s status as the global hub for business and finance at risk: particularly...
  • Devolution to the GLA and Boroughs

    • Reference: 2010/0069-1
    • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
    • Meeting date: 21 July 2010
    Will any forthcoming legislative changes ensure the maximum possible devolution of powers from Whitehall to London, both to the GLA and to boroughs as well?
  • Potential for Further Budget Increases (Supplementary) [19]

    • Question by: Geoff Pope
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    So you are reasonably confident that the figures will be achievable?
  • Potential for Further Budget Increases (Supplementary) [20]

    • Question by: Geoff Pope
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    Now some of those items might be either subject to overrun, and therefore higher costs, or it is very likely that the cost of transport will increase at a fairly high inflation rate. How are you tackling that?
  • Potential for Further Budget Increases (Supplementary) [21]

    • Question by: Geoff Pope
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    Can we move on to the budget item where we have absolutely no information, which is transport. We have a very exact figure of £794 million. What does this cover for the ODA core costs?
  • Potential for Further Budget Increases (Supplementary) [29]

    • Question by: Sally Hamwee
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    I was going to ask for slightly more than Geoff Pope has requested, which was if you can provide us, at the least, with a breakdown now of the transport costs which are, if you like, capital; the investment in the Jubilee Line upgrade and so on, and the revenue costs which relate to the operational matters that you have described?
  • Legacy (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    I still find it extraordinary that your idea of producing facilities that are at least as good includes a facility of a road racing track that is both sides of a main road. That is just ludicrous.
  • Legacy (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    When I was in the negotiations with the LDA it was never, ever suggested that the track that the Eastway Users' Group would go back to would be on two sides of a main road. I can assure you. I was there. It was never even suggested.