Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

Meeting type

Organisation

Question by

Status

Year

  • Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Stephen Knight
    • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
    Stephen Knight AM: Just one quick point and that is, is it legally possible to spend Section 106 or CIL money outside the boundary of a planning authority?

  • Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Murad Qureshi
    • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
    Murad Qureshi AM: Can I raise two or three issues. The first one, Eddie, I am grateful that you mentioned the canals at the outset. It is just unfortunate they do not show up on the maps. I have no doubts that residential developers will be eying those canal sides very eagerly, because I suspect they can enhance the values of the developments by up to 40%. That is the residential side. However, I am more concerned that they are used during the works construction on the site. I think this is going to be a huge development site, over...

  • Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [9]

    • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
    • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
    Jenette Arnold OBE (Deputy Chair): I have a couple of questions, one for Sir Eddie, and one for Victoria Hills. Sir Eddie, in your introduction you mentioned that the Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation (OPDC) master plan was similar to the blueprint adopted by the LLDC. I know, as one of the three Assembly Members for the area covered by the LLDC, and was heavily involved in the consultation and now I keep a very strong watching brief on what is going on, that many aspects of the LLDC’s vision has changed. For instance, the LLDC plan started...

  • Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [11]

    • Question by: Richard Tracey
    • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
    Richard Tracey AM: Thank you, Mr Chairman. Edward, can I first of all thank you for organising for the letter to Kit Malthouse [AM] about Wormwood Scrubs, which of course has been circulated to all of us. All of us on this side have received emails from many people who certainly were not constituents of ours but had some concerns, so I think it has helped very much to clarify, and I am grateful to Kit for writing to the Mayor about it. First of all though, I was going to say there is a lot of experience in this...

  • Numbers of Police Officers

    • Reference: 2008/0016-1
    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 03 December 2008
    Can you guarantee that there will be no reduction in the number of police officers as a result of the 2009/10 budget reductions?

  • Overtime

    • Reference: 2008/0018-1
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 03 December 2008
    What efforts are you making to reduce overtime spending? How will this be reflected in the 2009/12 Policing London Business Plan?

  • Targets

    • Reference: 2008/0019-1
    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 03 December 2008
    What targets will you be setting to follow the achievements of Sir Ian Blair?

  • Safer Transport Initiatives

    • Reference: 2008/0017-1
    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 03 December 2008
    How effective have your safer transport initiatives been at reducing crime and anti-social behaviour on public transport?

  • Oral Update

    • Reference: 2008/0064-1
    • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
    • Meeting date: 03 December 2008
    The Chair of the Lonodon Assembly agreed to allow the Chair/Commissioner to make an opening statement.

  • Human Trafficking Unit

    • Reference: 2008/0020-1
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 03 December 2008
    What discussion have you had with the Home Office about future funding options for the Human Trafficking Unit?