Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Stephen Knight
    • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
    Stephen Knight AM: Just one quick point and that is, is it legally possible to spend Section 106 or CIL money outside the boundary of a planning authority?
  • Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Murad Qureshi
    • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
    Murad Qureshi AM: Can I raise two or three issues. The first one, Eddie, I am grateful that you mentioned the canals at the outset. It is just unfortunate they do not show up on the maps. I have no doubts that residential developers will be eying those canal sides very eagerly, because I suspect they can enhance the values of the developments by up to 40%. That is the residential side. However, I am more concerned that they are used during the works construction on the site. I think this is going to be a huge development site, over...
  • Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [9]

    • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
    • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
    Jenette Arnold OBE (Deputy Chair): I have a couple of questions, one for Sir Eddie, and one for Victoria Hills. Sir Eddie, in your introduction you mentioned that the Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation (OPDC) master plan was similar to the blueprint adopted by the LLDC. I know, as one of the three Assembly Members for the area covered by the LLDC, and was heavily involved in the consultation and now I keep a very strong watching brief on what is going on, that many aspects of the LLDC’s vision has changed. For instance, the LLDC plan started...
  • Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [11]

    • Question by: Richard Tracey
    • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
    Richard Tracey AM: Thank you, Mr Chairman. Edward, can I first of all thank you for organising for the letter to Kit Malthouse [AM] about Wormwood Scrubs, which of course has been circulated to all of us. All of us on this side have received emails from many people who certainly were not constituents of ours but had some concerns, so I think it has helped very much to clarify, and I am grateful to Kit for writing to the Mayor about it. First of all though, I was going to say there is a lot of experience in this...
  • LLDC Funding

    • Reference: 2014/0001
    • Question by: Andrew Boff
    • Meeting date: 15 January 2014
    Will the additional money to be provided by the Mayor to the LLDC be sufficient to enable the creation of a thriving Olympic Park?
  • Community land trusts

    • Reference: 2014/0002
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 15 January 2014
    Will you deliver your manifesto promise to make part of the Chobham Manor site a community-led development through a Community Land Trust?
  • Number of homes to be built on the former Olympic site

    • Reference: 2014/0003
    • Question by: Stephen Knight
    • Meeting date: 15 January 2014
    How many homes will be built in each of the five new neighbourhoods being created across the former Olympic site?
  • Food growing

    • Reference: 2014/0008
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 15 January 2014
    What facilities are planned for residents to grow food in each of the Chobham Manor, Sweetwater and East Wick communities? Please list facilities such as balconies, allotments and roof gardens separately for each development.
  • Chobham Manor occupation engagement

    • Reference: 2014/0009
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 15 January 2014
    What stage is the Chobham Manor occupation engagement programme at, and will you publish details?
  • Chobham Manor management strategy

    • Reference: 2014/0010
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 15 January 2014
    What stage is the Chobham Manor estate management strategy at, and will you publish details?