Search questions

• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 11 June 2003

I am simply wondering how Mr O'Toole would ensure that any surplus generated by developing Tube assets is not taken away from the Tube and reinvested in the rest of the transport network. Your opening comment was that you wanted to see such assets developed to improve the Tube, but there is always a risk that they will be taken away and spent on buses, for example. Is that an issue for you, or are you a corporate player who is happy to sacrifice the Tube for the greater good of London?

• Question by: Noel Lynch
• Meeting date: 11 June 2003

You are saying that the objective is to make more money, rather than to take into account any local impact on business in the area?

• Question by: Noel Lynch
• Meeting date: 11 June 2003

I am bothered by Camden, where it is opposed by practically everybody including the Civic Society, the Architects' Forum, and all the residents and businesses there. We are just worried that we will see these types of corporate, soulless developments all over London, with the destruction of the local community.

• Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
• Meeting date: 18 September 2002

I want you to call a meeting here so that the Mayor and also the chairmen of these public bodies can brief us - the elected members of the GLA - on contingency plans for protecting London in the event of a terrorist act, or in fact of a strike of a public authority, which could render the capital inactive. This is very important and I think you should have this meeting instead of these odd little bits in answer to questions.