Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

Meeting type

Organisation

Question by 1

Status

  • TfL - past and future (Supplementary) [9]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 08 June 2016
    Len Duvall AM: Mr Mayor, in the past you have said that you would wish to see the increase in the proportion of TfL’s budget spent on cycling. Your predecessor planned to spend about 1.44% in this budget year. The Assembly has done a scrutiny report that said, really, it should be up to 2% to bring us in line with other pro-cycling cities. What do you think? What do you hope to devote to cycling by the end of your first term?

  • Reducing traffic in London (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 08 June 2016
    Len Duvall AM: Thank you very much. Thank you, Mr Mayor, for clarifying in answer to Assembly Member Kurten’s question that your ambitions for modal shift will lead to reductions in that traffic aspect. I want to bring you back to a question around devolution. I, like you, share the aspirations of devolution, but there are limitations to it. Your ambition for Healthy Streets, if we devolved some of the TfL budget for that and left it to the boroughs, would not happen, Mr Mayor. Would you agree with me that there are limits to devolution of those issues if...

  • Oral Update (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 03 December 2008
    Thank you for the way that you answered John Biggs' question. In light of your answer, will you go away and reflect to see that it is appropriate, and I might have some sentiments about where you think the outcome of things may go, for you or your office to talk to a potential suspect, even though you have nor role at all, but you may have information and be given information in briefings, during a criminal investigation? Will you go away to reflect?

  • Oral Update (Supplementary) [9]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 03 December 2008
    Can I welcome the remarks from Sir Paul Stephenson clarifying matters. I do welcome part of some of your remarks around where the police must be allowed to carry on and see this through, and at the appropriate time people will come back and look at it. In light of that, do you think it was appropriate to share your comments publicly about the ongoing police investigation was right?