Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

Meeting type

Organisation

Question by 1

Status

Year

  • Update since September 2017 plenary (Supplementary) [8]

    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 05 July 2018
    Nicky Gavron AM: When we were discussing at the Plenary last September [2017], we were discussing safeguarding land for industry, for logistics, for services. I want to ask you now how your approach to safeguarding that land in Park Royal and Old Oak has changed or developed.

  • Tenure split of 'affordable homes' in the Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation area (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 05 July 2018
    Nicky Gavron AM: I wanted to ask something that was prompted by a meeting of the Regeneration Committee yesterday, where we looked at the Royal Albert Docks and were told that infrastructure there is going to be funded from an uplift in the business rates. That is quite a considerable amount when it is projected forward and of course there is a lot of new development coming. It made me wonder. Is this mechanism available to you?

  • Maximising the OPDC’s benefit to London (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 05 July 2018
    Nicky Gavron AM: Can I just follow up on that? You said 25% of the new homes are going to be family homes or three-bed plus. You have not broken that down into whether they are three, four or five-bed. How many are going to be one-bed?

  • Earls Court – best value consultation 1

    • Reference: 2014/3057
    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 10 September 2014
    Is TfL is a best value authority for the purposes of the Local Government Act 1999?

  • Earls Court – best value consultation 2

    • Reference: 2014/3058
    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 10 September 2014
    If TfL is a best value authority for the purposes of the Local Government Act 1999, it must follow the Best Value Statutory Guidance. This guidance states: “before deciding how to fulfil their Best Value Duty – authorities are under a Duty to Consult representatives of a wide range of local persons.” Has TfL complied with this Duty to Consult in regards to the Earls Court redevelopment? What actions has it taken to comply?

  • Earls Court redevelopment

    • Reference: 2014/3059
    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 10 September 2014
    Who instigated the collaboration with Capco to redevelop Earls Court? Was it TfL or Capco? How and when did any mayoral influence come into it?

  • Lillie Bridge Depot

    • Reference: 2014/3060
    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 10 September 2014
    What are TfL’s plans for Lillie Bridge Depot in regards to the Earls Court development? When will a decision on the Depot’s future be made?

  • TfL Bill

    • Reference: 2014/3061
    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 10 September 2014
    Clause 5 of the Transport for London Bill would codify TfL’s ability to form and invest in limited partnerships. What powers does Clause 5 provide that are not already available to TfL?

  • Funding Agreement with LB Camden

    • Reference: 2011/0051
    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 19 January 2011
    When will Transport for London's funding agreement with the London Borough of Camden for Camden High Street and the Euston Road be announced?

  • CO2 impact

    • Reference: 2011/0052
    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 19 January 2011
    Has TfL produced a CO2 impact assessment of increasing bus fares?