Search questions

• Reference: 2009/0302-1
• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 09 December 2009

What criteria does TfL apply for decommissioning bus stops?

• Reference: 2009/0303-1
• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 09 December 2009

Will TfL decommission stops which are little used?

• Reference: 2009/0301-1
• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 09 December 2009

How many school buses and journeys are wholly funded by TfL? What are the criteria for such funding?

• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 09 December 2009

Yes. Speaking as a bourgeois NIMBY, could I please have clarity as to who it is who is going to take the final decision on bus stops? You have told me, Mr Mayor, when I have raised this matter in the past that if the boroughs do not support the relocation of a bus stop, that is the end of the matter. Indeed, I have recent correspondence relating to particular bus stops which are being installed one stop away from the terminus of a bus route, so who on earth do they think is going to get on the bus...

• Reference: 2009/0010
• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 14 June 2009

Bearing in mind the number of level crossings on its route, what would be the effect on highway traffic in Richmond Upon Thames and elsewhere of the introduction of AirTrack?

• Reference: 2009/0011
• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 14 June 2009

With regard to the decision on Stage 1 of Regal House in Twickenham, why does TfL believe that this 111 bedroom hotel does not need any car parking provision?

• Reference: 2008/0001
• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 16 January 2008

How does the Mayor intend to meet his environmental and housing objectives?

• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 16 January 2008

Thank you very much. You have told us lots about your good intentions and your principles and so on - and indeed about 90% of what you have said was about your intentions - but not what you have actually achieved. That really is rather like the expenditure that there has been on these programmes. Is it good value for money that, of the £2.7 million that has been spent on the Green Homes programme, £2.2 million of that has been spent on publicity and only £300,000 on actual insulation grant? Would you not say that the whole thing is...

• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 16 January 2008

The truth of the matter is, and this really is to the Deputy Mayor, that this was a publicity campaign. There was never any belief that there would be a substantial take'up, as indeed there was not a substantial take-up. It is a fact that every single one of the campaigns that you have had which do not involve compulsion relating to saving energy has been a complete failure. I wonder if I can put to you the amount of money that you have spent on Recycle for London; the Mayor has spent almost £1 million on this over the...