Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

Meeting type

Organisation

Question by 2

Status

Year

  • Earls Court – best value consultation 1

    • Reference: 2014/3057
    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 10 September 2014
    Is TfL is a best value authority for the purposes of the Local Government Act 1999?

  • Earls Court – best value consultation 2

    • Reference: 2014/3058
    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 10 September 2014
    If TfL is a best value authority for the purposes of the Local Government Act 1999, it must follow the Best Value Statutory Guidance. This guidance states: “before deciding how to fulfil their Best Value Duty – authorities are under a Duty to Consult representatives of a wide range of local persons.” Has TfL complied with this Duty to Consult in regards to the Earls Court redevelopment? What actions has it taken to comply?

  • Earls Court redevelopment

    • Reference: 2014/3059
    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 10 September 2014
    Who instigated the collaboration with Capco to redevelop Earls Court? Was it TfL or Capco? How and when did any mayoral influence come into it?

  • Lillie Bridge Depot

    • Reference: 2014/3060
    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 10 September 2014
    What are TfL’s plans for Lillie Bridge Depot in regards to the Earls Court development? When will a decision on the Depot’s future be made?

  • TfL Bill

    • Reference: 2014/3061
    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 10 September 2014
    Clause 5 of the Transport for London Bill would codify TfL’s ability to form and invest in limited partnerships. What powers does Clause 5 provide that are not already available to TfL?

  • Concern (Supplementary) [16]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 20 June 2012
    Boris, a large number of my constituents use the buses to get around boroughs like Havering and Redbridge because the rail links tend to be radial into town. So the announcement you have made today about the progress you are requesting towards resolving the strike is very welcome and I am sure they will be happy to hear that statement. But do you not share my surprise that the unions who were spending July campaigning for large amounts of money for working in the Olympics spent April campaigning for a candidate who was promising to slash public transport fares?

  • Funding Agreement with LB Camden

    • Reference: 2011/0051
    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 19 January 2011
    When will Transport for London's funding agreement with the London Borough of Camden for Camden High Street and the Euston Road be announced?

  • CO2 impact

    • Reference: 2011/0052
    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 19 January 2011
    Has TfL produced a CO2 impact assessment of increasing bus fares?

  • New Bus for London (3) (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 19 January 2011
    Roger Evans (AM): Can I welcome Mr Hendy's comments about the changing approach to disability access to buses. Certainly, back in that period 2001 to 2005, I was pointing out that wheelchair access was not, necessarily, the same thing as access for people with disabilities, and the removal of seats was far more harmful to people who needed a seat. Will that process now be changed for other public transport vehicles such as trains? We have seen the removal of seats in recent years and it is a big problem to the increasingly elderly population?

  • Transport Hubs

    • Reference: 2009/0313-1
    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 09 December 2009
    How successful have the Mayor's transport hubs been at reducing crime on transport networks and the surrounding areas?