Search questions

• Reference: 2014/3047
• Question by: Navin Shah
• Meeting date: 10 September 2014

Further to my question 2014/2845, will you now facilitate a meeting between TfL, residents and Brent Council to discuss residents’ concerns about Chamberlayne Road (Kensal Rise) which is causing congestion, noise-pollution, safety issues and is generally detrimental impact on local residents from extraordinary volume of buses?

• Reference: 2014/3057
• Question by: Nicky Gavron
• Meeting date: 10 September 2014

Is TfL is a best value authority for the purposes of the Local Government Act 1999?

• Reference: 2014/3058
• Question by: Nicky Gavron
• Meeting date: 10 September 2014

If TfL is a best value authority for the purposes of the Local Government Act 1999, it must follow the Best Value Statutory Guidance. This guidance states: “before deciding how to fulfil their Best Value Duty – authorities are under a Duty to Consult representatives of a wide range of local persons.” Has TfL complied with this Duty to Consult in regards to the Earls Court redevelopment? What actions has it taken to comply?

• Reference: 2014/3059
• Question by: Nicky Gavron
• Meeting date: 10 September 2014

Who instigated the collaboration with Capco to redevelop Earls Court? Was it TfL or Capco? How and when did any mayoral influence come into it?

• Reference: 2014/3060
• Question by: Nicky Gavron
• Meeting date: 10 September 2014

What are TfL’s plans for Lillie Bridge Depot in regards to the Earls Court development? When will a decision on the Depot’s future be made?

• Reference: 2014/3061
• Question by: Nicky Gavron
• Meeting date: 10 September 2014

Clause 5 of the Transport for London Bill would codify TfL’s ability to form and invest in limited partnerships. What powers does Clause 5 provide that are not already available to TfL?

• Reference: 2012/0021-1
• Question by: Navin Shah
• Meeting date: 20 June 2012

There are published maps of both London Underground and London Rail lines, with detailed predicted levels of passenger congestion, which inform the democratic debate about reducing congestion. Would you agree to publish and maintain equivalently-detailed maps of under-use of existing London rail transport corridors, compared to their estimated maximum passenger capacity (whatever the current train service), which could contribute to discussions about population increases in London?

• Reference: 2012/0022-1
• Question by: Navin Shah
• Meeting date: 20 June 2012

How old are the earliest current Oyster gates at stations, and what is their predicted lifespan? Do you accept that many of the green and red LED displays have degraded so much it is sometimes impossible to see if they are entry or exit gates? When will you upgrade the displays?

• Reference: 2012/0023-1
• Question by: Navin Shah
• Meeting date: 20 June 2012

Do you acknowledge the benefits of deflecting demand away from central London-bound journeys, into orbital and contra-flow radial journeys? What steps are you taking, regarding your promise to build orbital extensions to Croydon trams and the DLR, to meet at Bromley North, for instance?

• Reference: 2012/0024-1
• Question by: Navin Shah
• Meeting date: 20 June 2012

Thank you for your response to Question No. 928/2012. Can you confirm that London Overground stations that have multiple kinds of litter bins really do maintain separate processing streams for material put into "paper", "plastic" and general litter bins by passengers? How are the streams handled, and how pure are they? Are there predicted figures for final separated waste stream proportions, and have they proved to be accurate?