Search questions

• Question by: Steve O'Connell
• Meeting date: 31 May 2012

Steve O'Connell (AM): Thank you. Following on from Navin, a very good question actually, many of us have a problem with our Safer Neighbourhood strengths, and it is not just in Navin's ward. Your offer, Mr Mayor, for that information could well open up floodgates, so be careful what you wish for.

• Question by: Len Duvall OBE
• Meeting date: 31 May 2012

Len Duvall (AM): A number of boroughs have lost a number of staff, both civilian and police officers; you are talking about allocating the numbers that we have now from the recent Government grant, that is probably less than what they have lost through different ways. The figures I have seen, the figures provided by the Metropolitan Police Service, sorry, but you are talking about reallocating the smaller number of resources in terms of that, is this a new rough formula, the new policing model? What are we talking about? Are these the numbers that each borough is going to...

• Question by: Navin Shah
• Meeting date: 31 May 2012

Navin Shah (AM): I generally share some of the comments made about potential for either swallowing up or stampeding on the existing framework that might exist in the local areas or, possibility of the idea for both is not a bad one, but we will have to see what you actually come up with. The question to the Commissioner is, what timetable do you have for coming up with the whole framework for the board and, would there be any opportunity for any variation to adopt locally the right approach for the board itself for better accountability, better engagement?

• Question by: Richard Tracey
• Meeting date: 31 May 2012

Richard Tracey (AM): Mr Mayor, this is really a work in progress, as I understand it. I mean, you have not spelt out a great deal of detail to Steve O'Connell. This was something that was in your manifesto but you are intending to develop this over the next year or two years?

• Reference: 2007/0027-1
• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 13 June 2007

What work have you done for Transport for London under your Consultancy Agreement?

• Reference: 2007/0028-1
• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 13 June 2007

What is the purpose of the Consultancy Agreement between TfL and Bob Kiley and how does it offer value for money?

• Reference: 2007/0030-1
• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 13 June 2007

Why was the Agreement structured so as to prevent TfL from being able to require Mr Kiley to work at TfL's offices after June 2007?

• Reference: 2007/0031-1
• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 13 June 2007

What administrative, office and secretarial support has been provided to Bob Kiley under the Agreement? What has been the cost of this support?

• Reference: 2007/0032-1
• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 13 June 2007

On how many occasions and for what purpose has TfL paid for air or rail travel for Mr Kiley under the Consultancy Agreement?

• Reference: 2007/0033-1
• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 13 June 2007

Why are the records of Mr Kiley's expense claims incomplete? [No records of prior authorisation of expenses, no supporting information/evidence in support of the first three invoices, and lost receipt in relation to invoice No. 7]