Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Knife crime in London

    • Reference: 2015/1562
    • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
    • Meeting date: 03 June 2015
    Is tackling knife crime a priority for the Metropolitan Police Service?
  • Violent Crime in London (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
    • Meeting date: 09 December 2014
    A couple of very specific questions here around violent crime in London. Recorded knife crime with injury offences has gone up 51% in the last six months. We have had some terrible recent incidents across London. Given the success of the London-wide firearms amnesty last month, and this current hike in knife offences, would you consider launching a similar amnesty for knives in London?
  • Transparency in the Metropolitan Police Service (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
    • Meeting date: 09 December 2014
    That is really reassuring, Commissioner, because I think trust is really essential for the public and we have had some really recent high-profile cases where we have seen respected celebrities and other public servants jailed, some of them as paedophiles, and their hideous crimes uncovered, and I think with this sort of thing going on it is really important for the public to have absolute trust in the police and their investigations. Mr Mayor, do you think it is right for the MPS to have a compulsory public register of interests, including membership of the freemasons?
  • Safer Neighbourhood Teams

    • Reference: 2014/1255
    • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
    • Meeting date: 05 March 2014
    Are you satisfied that Safer Neighbourhood Teams are visible, contactable and effective under your new Local Policing Model?
  • Temporary Venues (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 21 October 2009
    In retrospect, do you regret perhaps not negotiating more robustly - I am choosing my words with care - with the IOC over some of its more elitist demands? For example, we spent vast amounts of money upgrading the transport system but it is insisting that nearly half the people have got the right to use the roads.
  • Budget and Venues Update (Supplementary) [28]

    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2007
    I am not arguing with the principle. I am just trying to understand how many of the 70,000 volunteer places will actually be available if the sponsors take up their allocation and do not decide to give them to the community. How many are going to be available for the community? Is it 60,000, is it 50,000 or is it 65,000?
  • Budget and Venues Update (Supplementary) [29]

    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2007
    I will come on now to sponsorship. There have been reports in the press that sponsors are going to get an allocation of tickets, which is perfectly understandable. I suppose you share my view and hope that it will not be like Wembley, where so many of the tickets are sold to people who have no interest in football and have their back turned to the game. My main concern is it is also reported in the press that staff of sponsors are going to get the opportunity to have some of the volunteer places. First of all I want...