Search questions

• Reference: 2015/1565
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 03 June 2015

If the Government proposes a "snoopers charter", will you ask for it to empower the Police to target domestic extremists?

• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 03 June 2015

One of my concerns with these terrible, savage, fast cuts to your budget has been that a lot of civilian staff have been lost, close to 4,000 since 2008. Do you know at the moment how many of those posts still exist and are being backfilled by police officers?

• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 09 December 2014

I want you to fast forward, OK, because Theresa May [MP, Home Secretary] has promised an inquiry, a judge-led inquiry, into undercover police officers, and supposing it happens in two, three, four years’ time, and you are called as ex-Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC) for London to give evidence, are you going to be able to give the evidence that they want to hear? For example, will you be able to tell them how many of the four officers that were looked at by the Herne Inquiry [Operation Herne – MPS internal review into use of undercover policing by the...

• Reference: 2014/1258
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 05 March 2014

Will the Metropolitan Police update its definition of a domestic extremist to take account of the recommendations made by HMIC in the report “A review of national police units which provide intelligence on criminality associated with protest”, published in January 2012?

• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 10 December 2003

Given that those responsible for racist and sexist behaviour in the force have often been responsible for homophobic behaviour as well, can you outline how homophobia is tackled as part of the programme of initiatives that Toby outlined?

• Reference: 2003/0251
• Question by: Noel Lynch
• Meeting date: 11 June 2003

What residual powers will be retained by LUL / TfL when the Underground stations are transferred by lease to the private infracos? In particular, will the private infracos be completely free (subject to planning controls) to develop station space above or around station sites commercially for maximum profit? .

• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 11 June 2003

Just as Bob said the absence of graffiti on the network would give vital reassurance to people in terms of safety, do you not agree that the presence of staff on the stations provides the same sort of vital reassurance to people on safety issues? It is not only going to be psychological; it is also going to be practical. There will be practical benefits of tackling graffiti, safety, crime issues, or whatever and you do need a visible presence there. CCTV cameras in themselves will not be sufficient. You do need to maintain that staff presence.

• Question by: Noel Lynch
• Meeting date: 11 June 2003

And if the public are totally against it?

• Question by: Noel Lynch
• Meeting date: 11 June 2003

You are saying that the objective is to make more money, rather than to take into account any local impact on business in the area?

• Question by: Noel Lynch
• Meeting date: 11 June 2003

I am bothered by Camden, where it is opposed by practically everybody including the Civic Society, the Architects' Forum, and all the residents and businesses there. We are just worried that we will see these types of corporate, soulless developments all over London, with the destruction of the local community.