Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

Meeting type

Organisation

Question by

Status

Year

  • Dissolution of LFEPA (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Fiona Twycross
    • Meeting date: 02 December 2015
    Fiona Twycross AM: I wanted to correct the impression that was given that the way it has been operating at the moment has been simply about opposition Members [on LFEPA] getting at the Mayor. The fact is that the Mayor has insisted on managing by Direction even when there has not been an impasse, including on issues over which there has been cross‑party agreement by LFEPA Members. I just wondered if you could focus a little bit on what impact the Mayor’s insistence on management by Direction has had. To be honest, we have had Directions on all sorts of...

  • Dissolution of LFEPA (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Richard Tracey
    • Meeting date: 02 December 2015
    Richard Tracey AM: Chairman, probably this is one for you as the politician of the two of you. The fact is, surely, that government, particularly local government, has been changing very considerably over recent years. That is accepted. The straight point to you: is it not correct that perhaps LFEPA in its current form is out of date and past its sell‑by date, really?

  • New Technology (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Fiona Twycross
    • Meeting date: 02 December 2015
    Fiona Twycross AM: We obviously have to make sensible use of resources in the face of cuts. Some of the new technology that could come online is really interesting and will offer exciting possibilities, but do you agree with the Londoner who contacted me yesterday to say that £283,000 for a website rebuild is bordering on scandalous?

  • Industrial Relations

    • Reference: 2011/0098-1
    • Question by: Navin Shah
    • Meeting date: 07 September 2011
    What efforts will you, and the Mayor, make to engage with the FBU to ensure a repeat of the recent dispute does not occur and Authority's reputation is not further damaged?

  • Shut in Lifts Policy

    • Reference: 2011/0100-1
    • Question by: Navin Shah
    • Meeting date: 07 September 2011
    What is the level of reduction in shut in lifts callouts since the new charging threshold was introduced and will the estimated income of £400k be achieved?

  • Fire Deaths 2

    • Reference: 2011/0103-1
    • Question by: Navin Shah
    • Meeting date: 07 September 2011
    Will you press the Fire Minister to support and take action on the installation of sprinkler devices to save the lives of those living in care homes and similar establishments?

  • LIFE Scheme

    • Reference: 2011/0085-1
    • Question by: James Cleverly
    • Meeting date: 07 September 2011
    In light of recent events in London, how is the London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority continuing to support the excellent LIFE scheme?

  • Members' Expenses

    • Reference: 2011/0091-1
    • Question by: Navin Shah
    • Meeting date: 07 September 2011
    Following the Mayor's stated dissatisfaction at the 'extravagant' level of expense claims will you consider an upper limit on Members' expenses, not only to spare the Authority further embarrassment, but also to save London taxpayers' money?

  • Standards Committee

    • Reference: 2011/0092-1
    • Question by: Navin Shah
    • Meeting date: 07 September 2011
    Given the Government's proposal to abolish the national Standards Board regime, what mechanisms will be put in place to ensure the monitoring of the conduct and behaviour of Members is transparent to Londoners?

  • Local Government Transparency

    • Reference: 2011/0093-1
    • Question by: Navin Shah
    • Meeting date: 07 September 2011
    What are your plans to open up future Authority meetings in order to comply with the Government statement on transparency in public meetings?