Search questions

• Question by: Stephen Knight
• Meeting date: 17 December 2014

Stephen Knight AM: Just one quick point and that is, is it legally possible to spend Section 106 or CIL money outside the boundary of a planning authority?

• Question by: Murad Qureshi
• Meeting date: 17 December 2014

Murad Qureshi AM: Can I raise two or three issues. The first one, Eddie, I am grateful that you mentioned the canals at the outset. It is just unfortunate they do not show up on the maps. I have no doubts that residential developers will be eying those canal sides very eagerly, because I suspect they can enhance the values of the developments by up to 40%. That is the residential side. However, I am more concerned that they are used during the works construction on the site. I think this is going to be a huge development site, over...

• Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
• Meeting date: 17 December 2014

Jenette Arnold OBE (Deputy Chair): I have a couple of questions, one for Sir Eddie, and one for Victoria Hills. Sir Eddie, in your introduction you mentioned that the Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation (OPDC) master plan was similar to the blueprint adopted by the LLDC. I know, as one of the three Assembly Members for the area covered by the LLDC, and was heavily involved in the consultation and now I keep a very strong watching brief on what is going on, that many aspects of the LLDC’s vision has changed. For instance, the LLDC plan started...

• Question by: Richard Tracey
• Meeting date: 17 December 2014

Richard Tracey AM: Thank you, Mr Chairman. Edward, can I first of all thank you for organising for the letter to Kit Malthouse [AM] about Wormwood Scrubs, which of course has been circulated to all of us. All of us on this side have received emails from many people who certainly were not constituents of ours but had some concerns, so I think it has helped very much to clarify, and I am grateful to Kit for writing to the Mayor about it. First of all though, I was going to say there is a lot of experience in this...

• Reference: 2011/0098-1
• Question by: Navin Shah
• Meeting date: 07 September 2011

What efforts will you, and the Mayor, make to engage with the FBU to ensure a repeat of the recent dispute does not occur and Authority's reputation is not further damaged?

• Reference: 2011/0100-1
• Question by: Navin Shah
• Meeting date: 07 September 2011

What is the level of reduction in shut in lifts callouts since the new charging threshold was introduced and will the estimated income of £400k be achieved?

• Reference: 2011/0103-1
• Question by: Navin Shah
• Meeting date: 07 September 2011

Will you press the Fire Minister to support and take action on the installation of sprinkler devices to save the lives of those living in care homes and similar establishments?

• Reference: 2011/0085-1
• Question by: James Cleverly
• Meeting date: 07 September 2011

In light of recent events in London, how is the London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority continuing to support the excellent LIFE scheme?

• Reference: 2011/0091-1
• Question by: Navin Shah
• Meeting date: 07 September 2011

Following the Mayor's stated dissatisfaction at the 'extravagant' level of expense claims will you consider an upper limit on Members' expenses, not only to spare the Authority further embarrassment, but also to save London taxpayers' money?

• Reference: 2011/0092-1
• Question by: Navin Shah
• Meeting date: 07 September 2011

Given the Government's proposal to abolish the national Standards Board regime, what mechanisms will be put in place to ensure the monitoring of the conduct and behaviour of Members is transparent to Londoners?