Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

Meeting type

Organisation

Question by

Status

Year

  • London Recovery Board and London Transition Board (Supplementary) [17]

    • Question by: Joanne McCartney
    • Meeting date: 02 July 2020
    Joanne McCartney AM: My question is to Niran. Looking forward at economic recovery, do you think there is a balance between jobs, in terms of the amount of jobs and job security we can offer, and making sure that companies offer good terms and conditions? Is that something that the Recovery Board has at the forefront of its mind?

  • London Recovery Board and London Transition Board (Supplementary) [19]

    • Question by: Keith Prince
    • Meeting date: 02 July 2020
    Keith Prince AM: Thank you, Chair. May I add my thanks to all the members of the panel for all the work that they are doing across London and helping Londoners. My question is for Mr Bellamy. I am sure you are aware, Mr Bellamy, that across London there are around 5,000 people being put up in the hotels by different partners at the moment, many hundreds of whom are rough sleepers. Will you work with me and a number of other organisations that I am working with across London to provide the accommodation and support services needed for those...

  • London Recovery Board and London Transition Board (Supplementary) [20]

    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 02 July 2020
    Siân Berry AM: I want to ask David Bellamy a follow-up on a written question that I put to the Mayor in May when I asked about emergency decision-making during the crisis. In answer to that question, which was question 1473, he told me that the decision to suspend the Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ), Congestion Charge and Low Emission Zone was an urgent TfL decision taken by TfL’s Commissioner, but this contradicts the press release the Mayor sent out, which said that he had instructed TfL to do this. The issue I want to raise here is about documenting...

  • Industrial Relations

    • Reference: 2011/0098-1
    • Question by: Navin Shah
    • Meeting date: 07 September 2011
    What efforts will you, and the Mayor, make to engage with the FBU to ensure a repeat of the recent dispute does not occur and Authority's reputation is not further damaged?

  • Shut in Lifts Policy

    • Reference: 2011/0100-1
    • Question by: Navin Shah
    • Meeting date: 07 September 2011
    What is the level of reduction in shut in lifts callouts since the new charging threshold was introduced and will the estimated income of £400k be achieved?

  • Fire Deaths 2

    • Reference: 2011/0103-1
    • Question by: Navin Shah
    • Meeting date: 07 September 2011
    Will you press the Fire Minister to support and take action on the installation of sprinkler devices to save the lives of those living in care homes and similar establishments?

  • LIFE Scheme

    • Reference: 2011/0085-1
    • Question by: James Cleverly
    • Meeting date: 07 September 2011
    In light of recent events in London, how is the London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority continuing to support the excellent LIFE scheme?

  • Members' Expenses

    • Reference: 2011/0091-1
    • Question by: Navin Shah
    • Meeting date: 07 September 2011
    Following the Mayor's stated dissatisfaction at the 'extravagant' level of expense claims will you consider an upper limit on Members' expenses, not only to spare the Authority further embarrassment, but also to save London taxpayers' money?

  • Standards Committee

    • Reference: 2011/0092-1
    • Question by: Navin Shah
    • Meeting date: 07 September 2011
    Given the Government's proposal to abolish the national Standards Board regime, what mechanisms will be put in place to ensure the monitoring of the conduct and behaviour of Members is transparent to Londoners?

  • Local Government Transparency

    • Reference: 2011/0093-1
    • Question by: Navin Shah
    • Meeting date: 07 September 2011
    What are your plans to open up future Authority meetings in order to comply with the Government statement on transparency in public meetings?