Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Vision for Old Oak Common (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Caroline Russell
    • Meeting date: 07 September 2017
    Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM: Thank you. I have three specific questions I would like to ask you. To fulfil your vision, your modelling shows you are going to need a nursery in place by 2020 and another two years later. I am pleased you have made progress on this in your work. We are rapidly approaching 2018 now. Are you confident the funding is going to be in place and that they will be completed on time?
  • Living wage (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    That is very welcome. Will you actually write that into the contracts, and has it already been written into those contracts that have already been let?
  • Living wage (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    Again, will there be independent monitoring, as I mentioned earlier with the sustainability issues, of contracts, compliance, and such like to ensure that it does happen, and it is actually delivered?
  • Damage to business from marketing restrictions (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    That sounds reassuring, because obviously, we want to prevent profiteering, and we want to prevent these big companies moving in and just profiteering without actually putting anything into the event or into the long term. However, in terms of the way the legislation that Peter (Hulme Cross) has shown me is being drafted, it does seem to imply that certain words would be banned in certain combinations. I am all for making sure that Nike or whoever cannot profiteer from this event, but if the local café wants to run an Olympics event night or something like that, I do...
  • Alternative sites for Travellers

    • Reference: 2005/0276-1
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    What alternative sites are being provided for the Traveller families displaced by the Olympics?
  • Waterways

    • Reference: 2005/0278-1
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    Given the massive potential for waterborne freight in the Lower Lea Valley, will the Olympic construction contracts require that construction companies make full use of the waterways surrounding the Olympics site to transport materials and waste?
  • Waterways

    • Reference: 2005/0279-1
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    What will be done to ensure that the potential for waterborne fright in the Lower Lea Valley is maximised during the legacy phase of the Olympics?
  • Waterways

    • Reference: 2005/0280-1
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    As a new lock at the junction of Prescott Channel and Abbey Creek could significantly increase the potential of the River Lea to carry freight, why does planning report PDU/0909a,b,c,d/02 stipulate that no new impounding structures be permitted?
  • Waterways

    • Reference: 2005/0281-1
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    Are there any plans to recommission Cody Dock for use by waterborne freight carriers?
  • Waterways

    • Reference: 2005/0282-1
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    During the initial construction phase of the Olympics, will facilities such as depots and concrete plants be placed in waterside locations?