Search questions

• Reference: 2007/0174-1
• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 05 December 2007

On what grounds could you take a case to court if the PPP Arbiter rules that London Underground owes the Metronet administrator substantial sums for cost overruns?

• Reference: 2007/0181-1
• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 05 December 2007

What priority is TfL giving to ensure that there is bus access to hospitals, and that bus stops on hospital sites are given priority over car-parks?

• Reference: 2007/0029-1
• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 13 June 2007

What is the purpose of the Consultancy Agreement between TfL and Bob Kiley and how does it offer value for money?

• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 06 December 2006

This is not a personal complaint, Peter!

• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 06 December 2006

Thank you for that. It is intended to be a constructive question as well as asking about constructive engagement. I think I have been asked to do it so that it was not Geoff [Pope] getting at you all the way through the meeting! I am glad to hear that because that was not one of the suggestions that was agreed before, and perhaps that can be taken forward both for you, as Commissioner, and others in TfL. There has been a reference this morning to difficulties about responses. Thank you for putting in place a liaison person. The experience...

• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 06 December 2006

The closure of the Waterloo and City line after Metronet had failed to clear the dust I am told: `Still no helpful facts six hours after the incident'. The PPP Arbiter's report, that was published at 7.30 am, I understand that Members and Members' staff were excluded from TfL's press conference at 11.30am and were not able to talk to TfL until 1pm the following day.

• Reference: 2006/0527-1
• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 06 December 2006

How can the Assembly arrive at a situation where we engage more constructively with Transport for London?

• Reference: 2005/0342-1
• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 08 September 2005

How will you ensure that the new communities established following the Games will benefit from sustainable and accessible public services (particularly health and education)?

• Reference: 2005/0357-1
• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 08 September 2005

Now that the Legacy Board established during the bid has been wound up, what arrangements will be made to take this legacy work forward? (Question addressed to all.)

• Reference: 2005/0360-1
• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 08 September 2005

Can you clarify the total number of new homes expected as a direct result of the Games and the location (by Borough and ward)? How many of these homes, and what percentage, will be designated as "affordable" housing after the Games is over?