Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

Meeting type

Organisation

Question by 2

Status

Year

  • Flood Management (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 17 March 2004

  • Flood Management (Supplementary) [14]

    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 17 March 2004
    I am just astonished that so much planning can go on before you actually understand the size of the risk. There are aspects to the development which are clearly going to go ahead before you have the full report.

  • Regeneration/Environment

    • Reference: 2003/0303
    • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    How much LDA money that had been earmarked for other projects has been set aside for the Olympic project? What will happen to these projects as a result? .

  • Regeneration/Environment (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    So, if I get the terminology right, there has been indicative funding for various projects, which are now not getting indicative funding because it is going to the Olympics. That is how I understand it.

  • Regeneration/Environment (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    My apologies. Can you explain?

  • Regeneration/Environment (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    Do you have a figure for the size of the adjustment?

  • Regeneration/Environment (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    So 25% of your future funding, which would have gone to other communities, has been adjusted to the Olympics?

  • Regeneration/Environment (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    Yes, and we accept that. In a sense I am being taken around the round-about here, am I not?

  • Regeneration/Environment (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    We accept totally the case for the Lower Lea Valley and all the rest of it. All we are asking quite simply is what are these `adjustments `and `indicative funding" and all the other terminology and has anything actually been delayed or lost out because this has greater priority. That is all; it is quite simple; there is no need to hide it.

  • Regeneration/Environment (Supplementary) [10]

    • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    You referred to adjustment in terms of future projects. Does that mean future projects will be delayed?