Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Subject: 3rd Runway Mitigation

    • Reference: 2015/2492
    • Question by: Richard Tracey
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2015
    Your report calls for a 3rd runway at Heathrow to be mitigated by a number of measures including the banning of night flights. Can you confirm that, if those mitigating factors were not introduced then you would no longer support a 3rd runway?
  • Subject: 3rd Runway Mitigation (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Kit Malthouse
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2015
    Kit Malthouse AM MP: Sir Howard, I wanted to ask a little further about night flights. When we last met when you appeared in front of the Assembly, you revealed to me, as somebody who lives under the flight path, this surprising idea that no flights land at Heathrow between 6.00am and 6.20am and that there was a moratorium on that. Since then, Heathrow rather helpfully produces on its website the actual landing times of flights and, of course, there are dozens and dozens of flights that land between 6.00am and 6.20am every single morning, including this morning. Would you...
  • Planning for Britain’s future aviation needs

    • Reference: 2014/2281
    • Question by: Richard Tracey
    • Meeting date: 18 June 2014
    Do you accept that a key part of planning for Britain’s future aviation needs is ensuring that the hub airport has space to expand further?
  • Independent Aviation Noise Authority (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Richard Tracey
    • Meeting date: 18 June 2014
    Richard Tracey AM: Can I question you a bit further on Heathrow? I do not know where you live, Sir Howard. I live in Wandsworth and a lot of my residents, of course, suffer from these early-morning flights you have been talking about. Indeed, Mr Graham was at the meeting a while ago and heard that people from Lambeth were complaining in exactly the same way as we are in Wandsworth. Do I take it that you accept that the current levels of noise, particularly early-morning noise, going into Heathrow are unacceptable for the millions of people who live underneath...
  • Independent Aviation Noise Authority (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 18 June 2014
    Tony Arbour AM: Arising from the last point that Mr Tracey raised, you told us that on the basis of what you already knew it is likely to be true that a third runway is going to generate less noise than two runways. I may say that my constituents in Hounslow and Richmond have frequently heard assertions saying, “More means less”, which has not proved to be so. I wonder if you can tell us on what you base your certainty that there will be a smaller noise footprint from a third runway than there is from the existing two...
  • Planning for Britain’s future aviation needs (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Kit Malthouse
    • Meeting date: 18 June 2014
    Kit Malthouse AM: I wanted to ask, in terms of the studies you do, whether you are looking at safety. Within living memory we have the Staines air disaster from Heathrow. It was only in 2009 I think that plane made it in over the fence, you remember, and crash-landed just on the apron. We have been lucky so far. The 118 people who died on the plane at Staines were not lucky but obviously you understand what I mean. I wondered whether you were looking at the possible impact or greater possibility of an impact of some sort of...
  • Planning for Britain’s future aviation needs (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 18 June 2014
    Tony Arbour AM: The everyday aggravation which is caused by Heathrow to local residents is not just noise and what has been indicated is the considerable amount of traffic which causes congestion to local centres. Any expansion of Heathrow of necessity means there will be an increase in that traffic. You just made a reference to the congestion zone. My understanding of the congestion zone proposal by Heathrow is predicated on there being a fourth runway in addition to the one which is being proposed. Roger Evans AM (Chairman): That is the first question. Tony Arbour AM: I did mention...
  • Infrastructure recovery (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Richard Barnes
    • Meeting date: 08 December 2004
    Prior to the election, I was a member of that Gold group, and I know how I was going to be ferried in to whichever point was possible. It is not always possible to get in to Scotland Yard, but there will be that gap when the international media are absolutely, totally hungry for news, as will be Londoners and the rest of the UK. Someone has to fill that gap, and I am asking, 'who?'
  • Alternative evacuation routes (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 08 December 2004
    One of the issues is, obviously, what would happen in a chemical attack or other form of attack which involves pollution of the air or water. One of the concerns then is that widespread panic could take place, so what would be the position of and what plans are there to physically constrain people within specific areas where those areas have been subject to the chemical attack?
  • Olympic Games (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Angie Bray
    • Meeting date: 08 December 2004
    Can I just ask ' I do not know who of you might have the answer to this ' have you been given any indication by 2012 what numbers to expect for an Olympic Games in London, were we to be successful with our bid of visitors? I have heard figures of perhaps a million extra people in London for the Olympics. Have you been given any sort of ballpark figures?