Search questions

• Question by: Nicky Gavron
• Meeting date: 05 July 2018

Nicky Gavron AM: I wanted to ask something that was prompted by a meeting of the Regeneration Committee yesterday, where we looked at the Royal Albert Docks and were told that infrastructure there is going to be funded from an uplift in the business rates. That is quite a considerable amount when it is projected forward and of course there is a lot of new development coming. It made me wonder. Is this mechanism available to you?

• Question by: Navin Shah
• Meeting date: 05 July 2018

Navin Shah AM: Again, going back to the meeting at Old Oak Common last night, tall buildings and densities featured very strongly. As a starting point, do you have a definition of what height constitutes a ‘tall’ building?

• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 05 July 2018

Caroline Russell AM: Thank you. I am picking up on the potential benefits to London and want to go back to Healthy Streets. Last time you were here, last September, we had a conversation about the 0.2 parking spaces per residential unit and I raised the issue that there are two different ways of measuring access to transport. There are Public Transport Accessibility Level (PTAL) measurements, and I also raised that Camden are combining those with Access to Opportunities and Services (ATOS), which gives a more nuanced and Healthy Streets-friendly approach. Now, I notice that you are still consulting -...

• Question by: Andrew Boff
• Meeting date: 05 July 2018

Andrew Boff AM: Could you tell me, please, what is the size mix of the 3,476 homes that are approved?

• Question by: Nicky Gavron
• Meeting date: 05 July 2018

Nicky Gavron AM: Can I just follow up on that? You said 25% of the new homes are going to be family homes or three-bed plus. You have not broken that down into whether they are three, four or five-bed. How many are going to be one-bed?

• Reference: 2012/0068-2
• Question by: Joanne McCartney
• Meeting date: 20 December 2012

Does the Metropolitan Police Service actually accept in broad principle the findings of the Leveson Inquiry?

• Reference: 2012/0071-2
• Question by: Roger Evans
• Meeting date: 20 December 2012

Yes, we have just got a few questions about Operation Condor, and I think my colleague, Andrew, has some questions about this as well. Deputy Commissioner, you recently carried out the operation in my corner of town in Havering and Redbridge, I think you arrested one person in Havering and nobody in Redbridge. How do you judge the impact of a large-scale operation like that against the resource costs?

• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 20 December 2012

Tony Arbour (AM): Do you have any views on that, Stephen?

• Question by: Joanne McCartney
• Meeting date: 20 December 2012

Obviously because the time has slipped for getting bids in to you by the end of February but the schemes are going to be starting in April, the new financial year, it does not give them very much leeway. Will you be giving them some extra leeway in how they can deliver those schemes?

• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 20 December 2012

This is an incredibly difficult area because in fact you do not want to stop whistle-blowers. You do not want to stop the police officers who are reporting on illegal activities within the Metropolitan Police Service. You want them to come forward. At the same time, you do not want false allegations leaked. In the past, the Metropolitan Police Service has had incidents where that has happened and officers do not seem to have been published. We have the de Menezes stuff and we have the Tomlinson stuff. Metropolitan Police Service officers have got away with false allegations or false...