Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 3

  • What are the biggest challenges with regards to policing and crime in London, and how are you and the Metropolitan Police Service delivering for Londoners? Vetting Officers (Supplementary) [9]

    • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
    • Meeting date: 02 December 2021
    Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM: Commissioner, we know that after serious concerns were raised by HMICFRS about a huge backlog in vetting and re-vetting of officers back in around 2018/19, progress has been made. But the Deputy Commissioner told me earlier this month that there are still around 100 officers whose up-to-date vetting status is in question. You accepted that vetting was not conducted correctly in the case of Wayne Couzens, but how can we be certain that you will swiftly implement the recommendations from Baroness Casey’s review and the current HMICFRS investigation into vetting when there have clearly been issues...
  • LDA Agenda (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 17 March 2004
    The thesis behind this question is that the Assembly has a statutory responsibility to hold the LDA to account, but you are not a creature of regional government; there are these multiple accountabilities. If we are to do our job in holding you to account effectively, we need to see how these conflicts are working, and we talked offline about the difficulty of, for example, making available publicly a Government Office for London quarterly assessment of you. I think we need to explore further how to see that relationship working better with government. Moving on to the second question relating...
  • LDA Agenda (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 17 March 2004
    In relation to the mayoral interventions, either directly or through advisors, at the Economic and Social Development Committee you said that there had never been a time when you had actually refused a request. There had been vigorous discussions, but the answer had never been `no'.
  • Recycling Rates

    • Reference: 2002/0217-1
    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    Much of the draft waste strategy, rightly, concentrates on improving recycling rates on some of the worst performing boroughs in London. What incentives are there for Councils already achieving pretty high rates of recycling? .
  • Recycling Rates

    • Reference: 2002/0222-1
    • Question by: Sally Hamwee
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    What funding have you and/or the Mayor been able to secure from Central Government to help improve recycling rates across London? Given all the statements that both you and the Mayor have made on this topic, does incineration have any place in the future disposal of London's waste? .
  • Consultation

    • Reference: 2002/0220-1
    • Question by: Sally Hamwee
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    How are you engaging in consultation with existing waste disposal authorities in London, and how are these consultations going? .
  • Kerbside Collections

    • Reference: 2002/0223-1
    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    Are you certain you and your officers really understand the problems involved in increasing recycling rates by using kerbside collections only? .
  • Recycling Rates (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    Would you not accept though that the majority of the money thus far has, as I say in my question, probably rightly been distributed to the low performing boroughs. What I'm really wanting to get at is what incentive there is for the high performing boroughs, those boroughs who have already made it a priority, actually to receive some reward, some recognition, from the distribution of this money.
  • Recycling Rates (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    Are you telling me then that the priority is not to give the money to low performing boroughs in order to drive them up. Surely, that is the priority.
  • Recycling Rates (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    Would you agree with me that probably the single greatest factor, and there are many factors, but the single greatest factor in what has determined up to now, what is a relatively high and a relatively low performing borough, is actually the political will to do so, and making it a political priority? And if you do agree, then what evidence and what monitoring are you doing to ensure that we get value for money from the significant sums of money now being put into traditionally low performing boroughs, who demonstrably have never made it a priority?