Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

Category

Meeting type

Organisation

Question by

Status

Year

  • Net addition to social housing stock

    • Reference: 2015/1668
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 17 June 2015
    What net addition to the social housing stock in London should you be making each year?

  • Transport for London Business Plan (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 23 May 2012
    Darren Johnson (Deputy Chair): Assembly Member Biggs has a point of order. John Biggs (AM): The Chair told us there was a standing order about making assertions for which there was no evidence. Now, the Mayor has at the one time made an assertion for which he has evidence that he can cut council tax. Now he has made another assertion that on fares, he can make no such commitment. There is a fundamental inconsistency, it seems to me, under standing orders. Either one can be said and the other cannot, and either the both can be said or neither...

  • Question and Answer Session: London Development Agency Settlement

    • Reference: 2011/0076-1
    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2011
    Simon, you wanted to make an opening statement. Thank you very much for coming along.

  • Question and Answer Session: London Development Agency Settlement

    • Reference: 2011/0077-1
    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2011
    Dee Doocey (Chair): Simon, you wanted to make an opening statement. Thank you very much for coming along.

  • Question and Answer Session: Mayoral Development Corporation

    • Reference: 2011/0078-1
    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2011
    Dee Doocey (Chair): We are now moving on to the session on the Mayoral Development Corporation (MDC). Can I start off the session by asking you, Simon, please can you explain the Mayor's proposals to create a MDC for the Olympic Park area?

  • Question and Answer Session: London Development Agency Settlement (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2011
    Good. That will certainly start to clear things up. On the home insulation and sustainability work that you mentioned, the implementation plan for the final version of the Climate Change and Energy Strategy in May 2011, will this take account of the new settlement as it is, rather than simply the projected wish list that you were working to previously?

  • Question and Answer Session: London Development Agency Settlement (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Andrew Boff
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2011
    Sir Simon, it is the job of the Labour Party to say it is all dreadful, being the rays of sunshine that they are, but in the context of this current climate this looks like a bit of a windfall. Can you tell me how the Mayor might be spending the unexpected amounts of money, especially --

  • Question and Answer Session: London Development Agency Settlement (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Joanne McCartney
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2011
    Do you expect those strands to be fully funded as originally envisaged or will there have to be some cutbacks?

  • Question and Answer Session: London Development Agency Settlement (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2011
    Yes, Chair. I am impressed the Mayor has created another functional body: Bacon for London! I have three areas of questioning - very briefly. The first is you are trying to clutch some sort of victory out of the jaws of defeat, I would suggest. The Government effectively abolished both the budgets and the entities of the Regional Development Agencies (RDAs) last year, while accepting that City Hall is going to have some economic regeneration capacity. I pay tribute to you personally because I know you have been scrambling in the background to try to persuade it that it made...

  • Question and Answer Session: London Development Agency Settlement (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2011
    Can I just understand the numbers a bit better. You talked about the £56 million that was all that was committed up to now but we have got £85.6 million in the budgets for this current year. Is that £85.6 million funded or is there now more in this current year, 2011/12, than that number?