Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

Category

Meeting type

Organisation

Question by

Status

Year

  • Net addition to social housing stock

    • Reference: 2015/1668
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 17 June 2015
    What net addition to the social housing stock in London should you be making each year?

  • Transport for London Business Plan (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 23 May 2012
    Darren Johnson (Deputy Chair): Assembly Member Biggs has a point of order. John Biggs (AM): The Chair told us there was a standing order about making assertions for which there was no evidence. Now, the Mayor has at the one time made an assertion for which he has evidence that he can cut council tax. Now he has made another assertion that on fares, he can make no such commitment. There is a fundamental inconsistency, it seems to me, under standing orders. Either one can be said and the other cannot, and either the both can be said or neither...

  • Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [25]

    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    So you are telling the Assembly that, simply based on the information that you held in your records, on the assumption that all of your records were complete, you were able to come to a conclusion with regard to what Brenda Stern said, that as far as you were concerned there is no case to answer? Would not the obvious thing for you to have done have been to go to the source of the allegations? Is that not an elementary thing to do? Why did you limit your investigation just to the material which you say that you hold?

  • Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [37]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    So are those the records that the LDA has of email traffic and other aspects?

  • London Development Agency Funding of Organisations (Supplementary) [10]

    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    So you are telling the Assembly that, simply based on the information that you held in your records, on the assumption that all of your records were complete, you were able to come to a conclusion with regard to what Brenda Stern said, that as far as you were concerned there is no case to answer? Would not the obvious thing for you to have done have been to go to the source of the allegations? Is that not an elementary thing to do? Why did you limit your investigation just to the material which you say that you hold?

  • London Development Agency Funding of Organisations (Supplementary) [14]

    • Question by: Sally Hamwee
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    Further discussions on a broader basis will take place with a more limited number of organisations, is that correct?

  • London Development Agency Funding of Organisations (Supplementary) [23]

    • Question by: Sally Hamwee
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    Not the rest of the 12 that were looked at?

  • Congestion Charge - Additional Costs to Businesses (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Damian Hockney
    • Meeting date: 06 December 2006
    Do you ask this question though; are your delivery companies and so on charging you?

  • Public Announcement Noise at Tube Stations (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Murad Qureshi
    • Meeting date: 18 November 2006
    I do often go through Earl's Court, simply because I can never get a Circle Line Tube, so I have to go there to get onto a District Line to go down in that part of West London. Should the emphasis not actually be on electronic information and the signs there being replaced as quickly as possible with electronic information, rather than putting it out on a tannoy, which I actually have not heard ever whenever I pass right through Earl's Court?