Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 4

  • London and Covid-19 Restrictions (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Lord Bailey of Paddington
    • Meeting date: 12 January 2021
    Shaun Bailey AM: Thank you, Chair. Good morning, all. Can I address my first question to Deputy Mayor Agrawal, please? When restrictions are easing and are being pulled back, what work is being done to prepare London to reopen, by the Mayor’s Office and by your office as well, please?
  • Effectiveness of the LEAP

    • Reference: 2019/11381
    • Question by: Susan Hall
    • Meeting date: 06 June 2019
    How would you rate the effectiveness of the LEAP?
  • Supporting Economic Growth

    • Reference: 2019/11382
    • Question by: Leonie Cooper
    • Meeting date: 06 June 2019
    Since the LEAP was created, what actions have you taken to support economic growth and job creation in the capital?
  • Underspends in community and environmental projects

    • Reference: 2019/11380
    • Question by: Caroline Russell
    • Meeting date: 06 June 2019
    Could you explain why there are significant underspends in your support for community and environmental projects?
  • Net addition to social housing stock

    • Reference: 2015/1668
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 17 June 2015
    What net addition to the social housing stock in London should you be making each year?
  • Transport for London Business Plan (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 23 May 2012
    Darren Johnson (Deputy Chair): Assembly Member Biggs has a point of order. John Biggs (AM): The Chair told us there was a standing order about making assertions for which there was no evidence. Now, the Mayor has at the one time made an assertion for which he has evidence that he can cut council tax. Now he has made another assertion that on fares, he can make no such commitment. There is a fundamental inconsistency, it seems to me, under standing orders. Either one can be said and the other cannot, and either the both can be said or neither...
  • City Operations Programme

    • Reference: 2011/0083-1
    • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
    • Meeting date: 20 July 2011
    What are your priorities in relation to the London 2012 City Operations Programme, and what do you think the key challenges and risks will be?
  • City Operations Programme (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 20 July 2011
    ): I am sure Members will have detailed questions on that wider experience and the work you are doing to keep the capital moving and so forth. All that good work though will be lost if the message does not get out that the wider Games experience has been a success. So I just wanted to start by concentrating on the narrow but important point of the non-accredited media and your arrangements around that, and I am sure the Members will widen it from there. As I understand it, there is about 20,000 or so expected on the accredited side...
  • City Operations Programme (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 20 July 2011
    Do you know how many, if any, privately-sponsored Live sites there will be in London in addition to ones that you are planning to have?
  • City Operations Programme (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: James Cleverly
    • Meeting date: 20 July 2011
    Mr Coleman, you touched on it just at the end of your answer to Tony Arbour's question about the bulk purchasing power. Can we be assured that the prices in the Look Book will be no more expensive because we don't have a brilliant track record of monopoly suppliers giving best value to purchasers? Can we ensure we fully utilise our joint purchasing power to ensure those prices are not going to be any higher than would be normally available on the commercial market?