Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 3

Category

Meeting type

Organisation

Question by

Status

Year

  • London and Covid-19 Restrictions (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Lord Bailey of Paddington
    • Meeting date: 12 January 2021
    Shaun Bailey AM: Thank you, Chair. Good morning, all. Can I address my first question to Deputy Mayor Agrawal, please? When restrictions are easing and are being pulled back, what work is being done to prepare London to reopen, by the Mayor’s Office and by your office as well, please?

  • Effectiveness of the LEAP

    • Reference: 2019/11381
    • Question by: Susan Hall
    • Meeting date: 06 June 2019
    How would you rate the effectiveness of the LEAP?

  • Supporting Economic Growth

    • Reference: 2019/11382
    • Question by: Leonie Cooper
    • Meeting date: 06 June 2019
    Since the LEAP was created, what actions have you taken to support economic growth and job creation in the capital?

  • Underspends in community and environmental projects

    • Reference: 2019/11380
    • Question by: Caroline Russell
    • Meeting date: 06 June 2019
    Could you explain why there are significant underspends in your support for community and environmental projects?

  • Net addition to social housing stock

    • Reference: 2015/1668
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 17 June 2015
    What net addition to the social housing stock in London should you be making each year?

  • Transport for London Business Plan (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 23 May 2012
    Darren Johnson (Deputy Chair): Assembly Member Biggs has a point of order. John Biggs (AM): The Chair told us there was a standing order about making assertions for which there was no evidence. Now, the Mayor has at the one time made an assertion for which he has evidence that he can cut council tax. Now he has made another assertion that on fares, he can make no such commitment. There is a fundamental inconsistency, it seems to me, under standing orders. Either one can be said and the other cannot, and either the both can be said or neither...

  • Question and Answer Session: London Development Agency Settlement

    • Reference: 2011/0076-1
    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2011
    Simon, you wanted to make an opening statement. Thank you very much for coming along.

  • Question and Answer Session: London Development Agency Settlement

    • Reference: 2011/0077-1
    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2011
    Dee Doocey (Chair): Simon, you wanted to make an opening statement. Thank you very much for coming along.

  • Question and Answer Session: Mayoral Development Corporation

    • Reference: 2011/0078-1
    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2011
    Dee Doocey (Chair): We are now moving on to the session on the Mayoral Development Corporation (MDC). Can I start off the session by asking you, Simon, please can you explain the Mayor's proposals to create a MDC for the Olympic Park area?

  • Question and Answer Session: London Development Agency Settlement (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2011
    Good. That will certainly start to clear things up. On the home insulation and sustainability work that you mentioned, the implementation plan for the final version of the Climate Change and Energy Strategy in May 2011, will this take account of the new settlement as it is, rather than simply the projected wish list that you were working to previously?