Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 3

  • Net addition to social housing stock

    • Reference: 2015/1668
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 17 June 2015
    What net addition to the social housing stock in London should you be making each year?
  • Progress and Future Goals

    • Reference: 2014/2582
    • Question by: Stephen Knight
    • Meeting date: 16 July 2014
    The provision of cultural opportunities in London’s outer boroughs and the improvement of the accessibility to London’s cultural workforce were two priorities in the Mayor’s 2010 Cultural Strategy. What progress have you made since then, and what are the future goals, for both priorities?
  • Cultural Metropolis revisions

    • Reference: 2014/2583
    • Question by: Fiona Twycross
    • Meeting date: 16 July 2014
    Why did you choose to update rather than replace or revise Cultural Metropolis? Can we expect further policy developments before the Mayoral election in 2016?
  • Olympic Cultural Legacy

    • Reference: 2014/2584
    • Question by: Andrew Boff
    • Meeting date: 16 July 2014
    What has been the cultural legacy of the Olympics and what efforts has the GLA made to help build a cultural legacy since the Olympics?
  • Music venues

    • Reference: 2014/2585
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 16 July 2014
    What are you doing to help safeguard the future of live music venues, of varying sizes, in the capital?
  • Transport for London Business Plan (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 23 May 2012
    Darren Johnson (Deputy Chair): Assembly Member Biggs has a point of order. John Biggs (AM): The Chair told us there was a standing order about making assertions for which there was no evidence. Now, the Mayor has at the one time made an assertion for which he has evidence that he can cut council tax. Now he has made another assertion that on fares, he can make no such commitment. There is a fundamental inconsistency, it seems to me, under standing orders. Either one can be said and the other cannot, and either the both can be said or neither...
  • Consultancy Agreement with TfL

    • Reference: 2007/0027-1
    • Question by: Sally Hamwee
    • Meeting date: 13 June 2007
    What work have you done for Transport for London under your Consultancy Agreement?
  • Consultancy Agreement between TfL and Bob Kiley

    • Reference: 2007/0028-1
    • Question by: Sally Hamwee
    • Meeting date: 13 June 2007
    What is the purpose of the Consultancy Agreement between TfL and Bob Kiley and how does it offer value for money?
  • Consultancy Agreement with TfL (2)

    • Reference: 2007/0030-1
    • Question by: Sally Hamwee
    • Meeting date: 13 June 2007
    Why was the Agreement structured so as to prevent TfL from being able to require Mr Kiley to work at TfL's offices after June 2007?
  • TfL Administrative support to Bob Kiley

    • Reference: 2007/0031-1
    • Question by: Sally Hamwee
    • Meeting date: 13 June 2007
    What administrative, office and secretarial support has been provided to Bob Kiley under the Agreement? What has been the cost of this support?