Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 1

  • Fuel for CCHP

    • Reference: 2016/0688
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 02 March 2016
    In 2010, your predecessors told my colleague, in answer to 2010/0056, about work to convert the CCHP from natural gas to renewable fuels. Can you update me on this work?
  • Embodied carbon and contractors

    • Reference: 2016/0689
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 02 March 2016
    In answer to question 2014/0006, last year, you set out energy performance targets for developers, following a commitment from the OPLC in 2010. But you didn't mention any targets relating to embodied energy, which was part of the OPLC's commitments, following exemplary work on embodied energy by the ODA. Can you set out how developer partners are being challenged to address embodied energy?
  • Chobham Manor occupation engagement

    • Reference: 2016/0690
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 02 March 2016
    Has the Chobham Manor occupation engagement programme been finalised, and can you publish details?
  • Food growing update

    • Reference: 2016/0691
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 02 March 2016
    Can you provide an update to your answer to question 2014/0008 on food growing provision being planned for residential neighbourhoods?
  • LLDC Value for Money (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Andrew Dismore
    • Meeting date: 02 March 2016
    Andrew Dismore AM: I would like to ask you some questions about the Orbit [Arcelor Mittal Orbit] and perhaps I could start by just establishing what I think are the agreed facts. You originally expected the Orbit to have 350,000 visitors a year. In 2014/15 there were only 124,000, a third of those forecast. In 2015/16 the target is 163,000 but by September 2015, halfway through the year, only 68,000 people had come and of course that was over the summer. That is 42%. You are losing about £10,000 a week. The 2016/17 visitor target is 239,000, rising to 261,000...
  • LLDC Value for Money (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 02 March 2016
    Len Duvall AM: Can we go back to the issues of transparency? You rightly cited the Olympics. It was probably was the best and most transparent Olympics around some of these issue. However, you do seem to have gone back and you have made this problem for yourself around the issue of the freedom of information (FOI) request from Sir Richard Hunt, who is a member of the Charlton Athletics Supporters Trust, by the way that you have dodged and swerved and not answered the issues in terms of getting to grips with the actual issues that people are asking...
  • LLDC Value for Money (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Andrew Boff
    • Meeting date: 02 March 2016
    Andrew Boff AM: Could you tell me how many contracts you currently have that contain commercially confidential information?
  • LLDC Value for Money (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Murad Qureshi
    • Meeting date: 02 March 2016
    Murad Qureshi AM: Whilst we are on confidentiality, can I ask why questions still exist around the power to veto the ground-share of the Olympic Stadium? Why do there seem to be questions remaining about who can veto the ground-share remaining on the stadium?
  • Outstanding and future challenges (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Richard Tracey
    • Meeting date: 02 March 2016
    Richard Tracey AM: Gentlemen, can you enlighten me? Is there some overlap between you and the Lee Valley Authority?
  • Outstanding and future challenges (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Fiona Twycross
    • Meeting date: 02 March 2016
    Fiona Twycross AM: Thank you. I wanted to ask a bit more about the LLDC’s financial resilience and the risks. You have alluded to risks and they have been raised by others. What risks do you believe a global economic downturn would pose to the LLDC and its priorities for delivery?