Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Proposed H14 (road) and H16 (pedestrian) bridges at Fish Island

    • Reference: 2017/4146
    • Question by: Caroline Russell
    • Meeting date: 02 November 2017
    The Mayor told me he has 'asked TfL to work with LLDC to review the traffic modelling options operating the bridges in light of [his] draft transport strategy'. Should the review highlight unacceptable traffic impacts on local people, will the bridge plans be cancelled?
  • Affordable homes increasing rents

    • Reference: 2017/4147
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 02 November 2017
    In response to my question 2017/3007 the Mayor revealed that the GLA provided £110m grant in total to Triathlon Homes for affordable homes in the East Village (the former athletes' village). Residents and local campaigners have said that Triathlon Homes have now increased the rents beyond what they can afford, forcing them to move away. What will you do to ensure that affordable homes in the Olympic park stay affordable?
  • Overcrowding in the Growth Boroughs

    • Reference: 2017/4148
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 02 November 2017
    According to the Convergence Strategy and Action Plan 2015 - 2018, the Convergence indicator measuring overcrowding for the Growth Boroughs worsened between 2009 - 2015. What are you doing to address this?
  • Gypsy and Traveller Community in Olympic Park

    • Reference: 2017/4149
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 02 November 2017
    How has the London Legacy Development Corporation (LLDC) sought to ensure that the needs of the Gypsy and Traveller community are being identified and met?
  • Affordable family homes

    • Reference: 2017/4150
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 02 November 2017
    Do you have a target for providing affordable family sized homes? What percentage of affordable family sized homes have been achieved so far?
  • Approving and Planning Foreign Travel (Supplementary) [14]

    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 14 March 2007
    I would like to say right up front I am not trying to score any points here, I would just like some progress. I am well aware that my name is on this list of people who have flown on behalf of the Mayor. What weight is given in the planning for whether or not to take trains rather than planes? It is clear that, for example, two people at least have gone to MIPIM [international property event] in Cannes this week, and the LDA automatically booked a flight because apparently you have to book a long way ahead. So...
  • Environmental Impact (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 14 March 2007
    I have one more question if you do not mind. I suppose what I would like to see is some really positive and clear climate change advantage from each trip; if you are going to fly, then get some real advantage from it. That is the sort of offsetting that I could accept. Are you concerned at the fact that flights by GLA people have increased more than threefold since 2001, because this does not fit with the Climate Change Action Plan? Are you going to reconsider this policy?
  • Environmental Impact (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 14 March 2007
    I do understand the rationale for what you are doing. However, if you have this cheaper oil it takes the pressure off in a way from looking for other alternatives, whether it is LPG or bio fuels, and this could actually slow down real progress on climate change adaptation.
  • Environmental Impact (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 14 March 2007
    Are you aware that the Green view of carbon offsetting is that it is actually just like a system of medieval indulgences? You pay the money and you actually still commit the sin.
  • Environmental Impact (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 14 March 2007
    My mistake. Let's talk about Brazil anyway. Brazil has actually got massive amounts of bio fuel from sugar cane. Why hasn't have some sort of arrangement with them, rather than polluting oil?