Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Extending cycle superhighway 2

    • Reference: 2016/0682
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 02 March 2016
    Cycle Superhighway 2 stops well over a mile short of the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park. Has the LLDC made an assessment of the extent to which visitor numbers to the park could be boosted if a proper segregated cycle lane between central London and the park were built?
  • Travel plans for West Ham stadium events

    • Reference: 2016/0683
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 02 March 2016
    Will travel plans for events at the West Ham stadium include a target of at least 5% of people arriving by bike?
  • Rolling out high quality segregated cycle lanes across the Olympic Park

    • Reference: 2016/0684
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 02 March 2016
    In his response to 2015/0854 the Mayor called for high quality, segregated cycle lanes akin to the one running on Waterden Road to be replicated across the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park. Where and when can Londoners expect to see new cycle lanes of this type being rolled out in the near future?
  • Stable tenancies update

    • Reference: 2016/0685
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 02 March 2016
    In 2014, the Mayor (as Chair of LLDC) told me that stable tenancy agreements for private renters was part of negotiations with development partners for neighbourhoods including East Wick and Sweetwater. Can you update me on whether any development partners have committed to providing more stable tenancies for private renters?
  • East Wick & Sweetwater process

    • Reference: 2016/0686
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 02 March 2016
    Can you outline the timetable for the East Wick and Sweetwater developments, including the selection of a Community Land Trust partner, developing and submitting the planning application, and getting on site?
  • Olympics Park and Venues (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    So you are guaranteeing that we are seeing no reduction whatsoever in the amount of public open space?
  • Olympics Park and Venues (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    So the other pieces of public open space which are not contained in this application will be in other applications or have been agreed already?
  • Olympics Park and Venues (Supplementary) [8]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    Thank you. David [Higgins] mentioned the size of the Park earlier, but the new planning application does reduce the amount of open space in the Park by the equivalent of 34 football pitches, from 127 hectares to 109 hectares. The application is smaller than the previous one. We are getting a smaller park are we not?
  • Olympics Park and Venues (Supplementary) [9]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    OK, thanks. If I can briefly move on now to sustainability standards? Last month the Mayor told us that now the budget had been agreed, we can expect improvements in the environmental standards for the Olympics. What changes will be made now that you have the money in the budget?
  • Olympics Park and Venues

    • Reference: 2007/0024-1
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    Planned expenditure on the park and venues has risen from £2.4bn to £3.1bn in the last two years. What long-term benefits will Londoners see as a result of this extra money?