Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Extending cycle superhighway 2

    • Reference: 2016/0682
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 02 March 2016
    Cycle Superhighway 2 stops well over a mile short of the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park. Has the LLDC made an assessment of the extent to which visitor numbers to the park could be boosted if a proper segregated cycle lane between central London and the park were built?
  • Travel plans for West Ham stadium events

    • Reference: 2016/0683
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 02 March 2016
    Will travel plans for events at the West Ham stadium include a target of at least 5% of people arriving by bike?
  • Rolling out high quality segregated cycle lanes across the Olympic Park

    • Reference: 2016/0684
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 02 March 2016
    In his response to 2015/0854 the Mayor called for high quality, segregated cycle lanes akin to the one running on Waterden Road to be replicated across the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park. Where and when can Londoners expect to see new cycle lanes of this type being rolled out in the near future?
  • Stable tenancies update

    • Reference: 2016/0685
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 02 March 2016
    In 2014, the Mayor (as Chair of LLDC) told me that stable tenancy agreements for private renters was part of negotiations with development partners for neighbourhoods including East Wick and Sweetwater. Can you update me on whether any development partners have committed to providing more stable tenancies for private renters?
  • East Wick & Sweetwater process

    • Reference: 2016/0686
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 02 March 2016
    Can you outline the timetable for the East Wick and Sweetwater developments, including the selection of a Community Land Trust partner, developing and submitting the planning application, and getting on site?
  • Complexity of Police Panels and Committees (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 08 November 2006
    Picking up on Valerie's (Shawcross) point, I certainly agree a borough- by-borough list would be extremely useful. In terms of the Ward panels it does seem to be extremely patchy, even within boroughs, from one Ward to the next. Whilst I agree a one size fits all approach of engagement is not going to be right across London, there do need to be some sort of minimum standards in terms of engagement and democratic structures and input from local councillors and so on, that does not seem to be happening. So will you be working with the boroughs to actually...
  • ID cards (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 15 June 2005
    I appreciate your answers but they do beg an awful lot of questions at this stage about the Government's proposals, and the Government`s proposals are now fairly well advanced. For Britain's most senior police officer to be asking such fundamental questions about whether they will be effective or not, or how they will be used, does beg some serious questions about whether we are going down the right road with these.
  • ID cards (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 15 June 2005
    On the issue of carrying ID cards, and I was very reassured by your comments that you do not want to go down the route at all of having to produce your ID on demand in the street, if we do not have a `stop and produce- approach to this, then how can they be effective?
  • ID cards (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 15 June 2005
    ): If it is not the whole answer, then basically we are just providing another tool for people to counterfeit, and it is not going to tackle any of the problems of identity theft, of fraudulent access to benefits, or whatever, is it?
  • ID cards (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 15 June 2005
    Finally can I just ask a question about the cost of them? Do you think that that provides good value for money - several billion pounds and then the cost per person? Do you think that provides good value for money in terms of tackling fraud or serious crime or terrorism or whatever, or would you prefer that money to be made available to you for other things to spend on, in terms of tackling death, crime, etc.